1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB Playoffs

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Angola!, Sep 22, 2006.

  1. Vic Mackey

    Vic Mackey Member

    To answer someone's question, Terrence Long struck out looking a few years ago to end an Oakland-Boston series. I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think it was 2004.

    I am constantly amazed at the number of pitchers who thrive in the National League and can't keep the ball inside of 450 feet in the American. Suppan goes 51-61 in his AL career, only once with an ERA below 4.50 (4.37 in 2001), gets traded to Pittsburgh in 2003, and since then is 54-33. (In the interests of full disclosure, he did go 1-7 for Arizona as a 23-year-old in 1998.) His highest ERA since moving to the NL for good is 4.16.

    Apparently, both Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux told other players they would never go to the American League for any reason. They knew they'd get killed. (I'm not a guy who believes in superiority for one league over the other, but I find it to be an amazing discrepancy.)

    And how about Scott Rolen walking away from Chris Myers?
     
  2. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Oh no, Beltran gets some blame. You sign a $119 million contract because of your bat, you get blamed for striking out in the bottom of the ninth of Game 7 of the NLCS with the bases loaded and your team down by two runs. Fact o' fucking life.
     
  3. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    So I've missed all the fun and games tonight because I couldn't log in from work.

    Despite the outcome, that was a great fucking game to watch.
    The Mets loss doesn't bother me all that much.
    Losing a bet to the cocksuckingmotherfuckingsonofabitchpieceofshitscumbagasshole dickhead.... well that's another story.
     
  4. Montezuma's Revenge

    Montezuma's Revenge Active Member

    Leyland has got to set it up so Rogers goes Games 2 and 6. Why mess with Rogers' home-field mojo?

    And BYH, why would Beltran have been fooled by an 0-2 curveball? That's Wainright's money pitch, and he sure as hell wasn't gonna give him a fastball to yank out of the park.

    VERY bad AB by a normally clutch performer: Looks at a grooved, 84 mph nothing ball for a strike, takes a bad hack at a curve out of the zone, and then looks at strike 3.
     
  5. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Actually, if YOU REALLY want to blame Willie, there's two reasons to do so:

    a) Keeping Wagner in the 'pen for the entire game. Use your best pitcher in a Game 7, please. That's what he's there for. (And no, I don't blame Grady Little. You always go with your best pitcher when you can.)

    b) Sending Cliff Floyd up to go for the game-ending home run ... instead of THE RIGHT MOVE, which was to bunt those two runners over and put *both* runners into scoring position with one out. That changes the entire mindset of the Cardinals' defense, which could afford to be more "relaxed" (if you can be relaxed in the ninth inning of a Game 7, I mean) with a double play in order. As it was, neither Reyes or Lo Duca or Beltran could get a hit, so the point is moot. But you change the situation if those runners are 2nd and 3rd, as they should have been, not 1st and 2nd. And I'd take my chances with Reyes and Lo Duca to get a hit with RISP, and get the tying run home.

    Nail in the coffin, baby. Willie blew it.
     
  6. broadway joe

    broadway joe Guest

    No problem with him not using Wagner. He'd had a lousy series and I don't blame Willie for not trusting him.

    You're right about the ninth inning strategy, though. Tough to send Floyd up there hoping for a homer when he hadn't faced live pitching in a week. Send your best bunter up to the plate and get the runners to second and third. Then you have two .300 hitters coming up and all you need is a single to tie instead of an extra-base hit.

    Fuck. Maybe next year the Mets can get to the playoffs with an actual pitching staff.
     
  7. jagtrader

    jagtrader Active Member

    Games like this are why I love baseball. It just defies reason.
     
  8. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    Okay, so where were you when Pube was fellating A-Rod three weeks ago?
     
  9. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    I see the point on bunting the guys over, especially with Reyes coming up (presumably, the Cards would not want to intentionally walk the leading thief in the game). But I'm not big on giving away an out when you're down to your last three. Of course, if Willie bunts and Reyes' liner is hit just a little softer and it drops...tie game.

    As for Beltran, I was just so shocked to see the guy taking there I had to think he was completely fooled. but that couldn't be the case. What was it I was saying...oh yes, complementary piece, not the centerpiece. :D :D
     
  10. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    Beltran can swing all day... there's no way he's hitting that.

    And THAT is what the NY pricks should be writing.
     
  11. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    Point b is being criminally undercovered in the "Why didn't Beltran swing" simpleton coverage in that hellhole.
     
  12. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    The good thing about the fact that the Nats will never see the playoffs in my lifetime is I won't have to be so bitter and hateful when they get beat.
    Yeah, HB, BIG BALLS pitch. Young pitcher, great hitter. Maybe a tendency to think, "OK, that's my money pitch but if I hang it just a bit it's going way out of here. Let me waste one." Nope. He came with his gold and it was MONEY.
    As Columbo said, no way he's hitting that.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page