1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB Thread Number 3, 2007

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Flying Headbutt, May 5, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    No wonder I failed that math class. :D
     
  2. HeinekenMan

    HeinekenMan Active Member

    Wow. Spnited wins the prize. Alexander's numbers really say something, but I'm not sure what that something is. I believe guys threw more innings in those days. There were probably fewer strikeouts late in games than there are today with relievers taking the hill. I don't know that hitters were as good as they are today.

    So maybe Glavine's is the lowest among modern-day pitchers. A quick glance showed that most of the more recent 300-game winners ended their careers with 3,500 or more Ks. Glavine might not make 2,700 if he retires this year or next year.
     
  3. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    I love baseball-reference.com

    It does look like Glavine will have the lowest K/9 ratio since Alexander, who had nearly 5,200 IP in 20 years. Glavine just past 4,200 IP in 21st season
     
  4. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Pretty interesting discussion here. I wasn't aware of Glavine's K/9 numbers, but I asked somebody better than me at this stuff to sort the list of 300-game winners by K/9 so we could compare.

    In the meantime, here's a few notables from the K/9 career leaders list on B-R.com (minimum 1,000 IP and 100 decisions ... "+" means HOFers).

    After the top 10, I pulled out most of the HOFers:

    I could go on, but I think you can see that Glavine's not in terrible company on that list. He's slightly ahead of Palmer and Catfish, neither of whom won 300 games but who pitched in a similar hitter-friendly era.

    Conclusion A: Strikeouts are often overrated. Dominance is fun to watch, but the greatest pitchers would rather get batters out on 1 pitch instead of 3.

    Conclusion B: Strikeouts weren't nearly as important in the Dead Ball Era, nor were batters swinging from their heels and missing the ball so much back then. As you can see, Walter Johnson is 10 spots behind Tom Glavine on this list. That tells you all you need to know.

    Conclusion C: Rube Waddell is so far ahead of his Dead Ball contemporaries that it's not even funny. Nobody else in the top 171 all-time even pitched a single inning before WWII. You have to get to Dazzy Vance (172) and Smokey Joe Wood (173) to find anyone else from Waddell's era.
     
  5. JackyJackBN

    JackyJackBN Guest

    Waddell--wouldn't you love to have him around to interview?

    Of course, if he lived today, Waddell would have been different--or institutionalized--and Shoeless Joe would have been able to sign his name.
     
  6. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Hell, Rube was all but institutionalized in his time anyway. What an amazing, tragic, amazing story. Can't imagine you'd get much out of an interview before he went off to chase fire trucks, though. :D

    And friends in low places have delivered. Here's your list of 300-game winners, sorted by career K/9. Glavine's not even close to the bottom, although he'll be third-to-last (Spahn, Wynn) among post-WWII pitchers. But he'll replace Walter Johnson at No. 9 among the 23 pitchers:

     
  7. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Andrew Miller will get his first major league start on Friday. Bonderman heads to the DL with a blister problem that won't go away.

    Miller started the season in A ball, made one start in AA and is now summoned to the big club.
     
  8. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Two things. Now that Wickman is back, is he going to close or Soriano?

    Also, why isn't anyone blaming the Yankees for the seflishness they're letting Clemens get away with? All he did was game the system to his advantage the way tons of players would if they could. Players come and go in the middle of a season all the time, he's no different in that regard. That he's allowed to come and go as he pleases is the fault of Steinbrenner and Cashman, not Roger. There's no real need for him to keep pitching anymore. He's in it for the thrill of a pressure situation and he got it. He's doing it his way now and if teams feel that's worth it, bully for them.
     
  9. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    That's 4.3 Ks per nine innings... nowhere close to 1.
     
  10. Angola!

    Angola! Guest


    Chien-Ming Wang has thrown 361 innings and struck out just 133 in his career.
     
  11. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    Wickman looks gassed in games, which I would think is more concern than the injury. He's just not in shape. Beyond that, Mike Gonzalez wants to close and has the stuff to close. Maybe not this year, but that eventually will be his role.
     
  12. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    I don't see them giving up on Wickman this season. Wickman did look rather pissed when he was yanked in the second game at Coors Field with the save opportunity still there. If I remember, Peter Moylan of all guys was called upon to finish the job. It wasn't necessarily the injury that night, because Wickman sucked the next day, too.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page