1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB to Small Town America: Drop Dead

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, Nov 18, 2019.

  1. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Law was right about the MVP.
     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    No he wasn't.
     
  3. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Because the triple crown? Do you really still believe those are the 3 most important offensive stats?

    I also don’t think it’s some egregious error. It was damn close, but if the only argument is the triple crown I think that’s lazy.
     
  4. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    A minor league base ball team may mean more to a small town that a major league franchise to a large community. But decisions are generally made based upon gross revenues, not per capita revenues.
     
  5. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Mookie was the 2016 AL MVP.
     
    JC likes this.
  6. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    Will MLB offer any financial support to the wooden bat collegiate leagues?
     
  7. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    And would not be traded for Trout by the Sox.
     
  8. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    This is the ancient argument that runs up against the historic truth that Most Valuable Player means whatever the voters decide it means and throughout history, the voters have had a slight but discernible bias in favor of one excellent player having his historically best year (in Cabrera's case, an historic year by any standards) over the guy who is generally considered the league's best player AND the obvious and large bias towards rewarding team success as part of the definition of valuable. For the record, I am generally in favor of bias 1 and against 2. But it's a useless argument because it's settled by the votes of now 30 individual and highly opinionated baseball writers. There will never be a universally agreed standard for MVP. JC was right in his second post. It was a close case. In close cases, there are going to be controversies.
     
    JC likes this.
  9. Jake from State Farm

    Jake from State Farm Well-Known Member

    My argument was never that Trout wasn’t deserving
    Of course he was
    But Cabrera had a historic year on a championship team
    And a lot of Law’s argument was belittling Cabrera
     
    cyclingwriter2 likes this.
  10. Jake from State Farm

    Jake from State Farm Well-Known Member

    Do you think George Bell was the 1987 MVP over Alan Trammell?
     
  11. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    No
     
    Jake from State Farm likes this.
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    And that’s partly why the voters vote the way they do. Where else do you get to rehash a 33 year old argument? How else does the everlasting Schmuck who didn’t vote for Tom Seaver to get into the HOF get immortality? Some voters are just attention whores that want the light on them for the achievements of others.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page