1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mothership lets a racial slur slip in a headline on its mobile browser

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by biggy0125, Feb 18, 2012.

  1. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    You may have a point. Whitlock may harbor a hatred against minorities because he may secretly be a minority himself.
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Writing a headline and placing it on a story requires a chain of thought. Speaking requires no thought, as we see played out for basically 12 hours a day all over talk radio. I doubt any of us has ever written a headline we don't remember writing, but everyone says something they don't even remember saying.
     
  3. Mystery Meat II

    Mystery Meat II Well-Known Member

    It's not writing vs. TV: it's headline vs. spur-of-the-moment slip of the tongue in the middle of a discussion. You can't accidentally write something. Now if the TV anchor started a segment with it, that'd be close to a straight-across comparison. Something like ... this:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  4. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Bottom line, it was wrong. The deed did not go unpunished.
     
  5. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    If you keep posting every time you're wrong, Drip, you'll overtax the server. ;)
     
  6. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    The thing is, if not for the headline writer's use of the phrase, I doubt anybody would have thought twice about the way the anchor used it.

    MMII's illustration is both hilarious and right on point. You can tell from tone and inflection when someone on TV is trying to get cute with a pun or whatever. That wasn't the case with the anchor who was suspended.

    Another interesting point I saw made by a reader email in Peter King's column today was that no one has even thought twice about repeating the slur in its full glory when discussing the story. If they had used the common slur for African Americans or for Hispanics, not a single media outlet would have reprinted the word, yet no one has seemed to have a problem repeating the one used in the ESPN headline.

    I suspect it's because the word itself has an alternate -- and, I think it can be argued, more common -- usage in everyday conversation. That also explains why it was more understandable for the anchor to use it and not the headline writer.
     
  7. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Dude who got fired by ESPN appears to be trying to milk it into a reality show appearance or something:

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/g2gn26
     
  8. Crash

    Crash Active Member

    Sometimes you should just say, "I'm sorry."
     
  9. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    He actually had it going except for the Mother Teresa comparison paragraph.
     
  10. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    I feel that the kid made a mistake. I don't think it was done intentionally and if his body of work was overall good, a suspension of some sort would've been fine. I think WWL is trying to cover its ass with a small blanket.
     
  11. MightyMouse

    MightyMouse Member

    Seriously. I didn't feel one way or the other about him before, but now I really don't like him.
     
  12. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Exactly. Not really the time to apply for sainthood.

    Good for you for doing the volunteer work. It doesn't work as a "Get to use 'chink' free" card.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page