1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Twirling Time, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    California had a head start and denser cities.

    Tennessee had it's highest single-day deaths total a week ago. California's was back in April.

    Just because Tennessee isn't as bad as the largest state in the country—a state which has three of the top 10 biggest cities in the United States compared to Tennessee's one in the Top 25—doesn't mean current trends aren't also bad for that state.
     
  2. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    We all know you are being disingenuous, but I'll play along anyway by asking, is death the only metric that matters to you?

    If you want to judge by, you know, people actually getting sick, then NC has some work to do:

    CA | 39,500,000 | 157,000 | 0.397%
    NC | 10,490,000 | 48,188 | 0.459%
     
  3. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    I think experts believe:

    % of hospital capacity is big for the present
    % of tests that are positive is the metric for the near future
    Death toll (per 100K) is the ultimate arbiter, I suppose.
     
  4. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    Tennessee's numbers are likely crap. Every state with at least 16,000 cases but one has more deaths than Tennessee (almost 33,000 cases). Minnesota with a similar amount of cases has almost three times the deaths. I mean, there is going to be varying numbers regardless and some places are going to be better than others, but how has Tennessee done so well? I guess by not listening to the media.
     
    Spartan Squad likes this.
  5. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    1.Death is BY FAR the most important metric. It's the ONLY reason we're taking all these steps that we don't take for less deadly (but just as contagious) viruses.
    2. "Sickness" numbers are a curiosity, bit it only means "reported positives." That's an influence of testing. "Cases" do not equal "sickness" because we don't know how many had it and never fell ill.
     
  6. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Bad numbers: "See? We told you so!"
    Good numbers: "They're crap!"

    Heads I win. Tails you lose.
    Every time.
     
  7. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    I'm sure the 1,197 dead neighbors of yours there in NC are happy to hear you are just as concerned about their welfare as you were your hair length.
     
  8. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    He's 79 years old and this has been his life's work. He's got to be frustrated by the idiocy of Trump, but I am sure his objective is to try to counteract it as best as he can.
     
  10. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

  11. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Good numbers with a coherent science-based plan: Hey not bad

    Good numbers from a state that votes to say the media is lying to you about this: Show your work...
     
    Baron Scicluna and Roscablo like this.
  12. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    It's becoming more clear by the day that there is 100% percent tolerance among the decision makers for COVID infection rates of any sort...meaning, they most definitely WILL play because there is no authority who will stop them.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page