1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NASCAR running thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by franticscribe, Jan 17, 2011.

  1. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    NASCAR has dodged many bullets since Feb. 18, 2001.
     
  2. JosephC.Myers

    JosephC.Myers Active Member

    Yes, they have. They've done a lot of work to make things safer, but there's still a lot of danger there.
     
  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    There's more to it than meets the eye. SAFER barriers also can bounce cars backwards. At certain areas of a track (like, for example, where Hamlin hit), the tendency (taking into account the expected angle at which the car would approach the wall) might be to send a car careening backwards and against the grain of traffic.
     
  4. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    With the way these cars are now, I'd rather take my chances on a crash in traffic. Head-on into a concrete wall, no thank you.
     
  5. JosephC.Myers

    JosephC.Myers Active Member

    It's one of those "lesser of two evils" scenarios. I wouldn't want to be hit by a car in traffic like that, but to me, that's better than hitting concrete and just stopping so damn fast. It's not how fast you're going when you hit the concrete that kills you. It's the sudden stopping andd snapping of your neck and vital organs.
     
  6. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    It's nice of you to consider the other drivers.
     
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    All true ... the driver hitting the wall isn't the only consideration, though. Still, with the newer (and clearly safer) cars, some re-thinking of the extent of SAFER coverage is certainly warranted.
     
  8. expendable

    expendable Well-Known Member

    Maybe not. The car going back onto the track against the traffic is carrying a little speed. If it's going 50 mph, and the oncoming traffic has only managed to slow to 130, and the damaged car makes direct contact with another car, it's the equivalent of two cars hitting the wall at 180 mph.
     
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Part of this is on Hamlin for locking up the brakes so early and keeping them locked.

    SAFER crush barriers were specifically designed to reduce the likelihood that a car is bounced back into traffic - as was sometimes the case with the old PEDS barriers or the IPS system.

    Can't prevent everything, but a SAFER barrier at that spot is likely an upgrade.
     
  10. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    NRA 500 or whatever the hell it was at Texas featured some infield entertainment that befits the sponsor:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/14/nra-500-suicide_n_3082119.html
     
  11. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Man, I didn't think the racing at Texas was THAT boring.
     
  12. I noticed FOX made no reference to the NRA sponsorship of the race. NONE.
    How unusual is that?
    Anyone listen to the race? Did PRN do the same?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page