1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Nashville Predators moving to Canada? NOPE! Sorry, Canucks (and KC!)...

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, May 23, 2007.

  1. Beef03

    Beef03 Active Member

    For another 3,500 seats I doubt it would cost another $100 million. The thing is they could have just left room for expansion within the building, I don't believe they did that. At the time, if I remember correctly, it was debated on whether they should or should not, and they went the second route. Ensuring the league will not come back there until there is an NHL-size rink -- bare minimum 17,500.
     
  2. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    I looked at the numbers -- realistically, probably close to$60 million - $75 million. The Coyotes' arena opened less than a year before than the Winnipeg arena. The Coyotes have about 2,800 more seats. It's a very nice building but hardly opulent. The Coyotes' arena cost $180 million US. The one in Winnipeg was $133 CDN, at a time when there was a fairly significant difference in the currency values. That's a pretty big difference to shell out solely in the hopes you'll someday get an NHL team again.
     
  3. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    He tried to steal the Penguins from Pittsburgh. He tried to steal the Sabres from Buffalo. He started printing tickets for the Hamilton Predators before he even had an agreement in principle to buy the team.

    He's an arrogant, ignorant foof with no common sense whatsoever and that's why the NHL wants nothing to do with him.
     
  4. Rough Mix

    Rough Mix Guest

    How does Boots filing affect Craig Leipold and Phil Falcone, if at all?
     
  5. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    If he would only take one step at a time rather than taking five, he might have had a franchise by now. To borrow a phrase used here before about the man, he's a pit bull in a china shop. A little patience (and adherence to the NHL process) probably would have gone a long ways.
     
  6. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Not at all. Leipold sold the Preds to another group last summer and subsequently bought the Minnesota Wild. Falcone is a minority investor in the Wild.
     
  7. Rough Mix

    Rough Mix Guest

    Thanks. I didn't follow the Nashville sale that close.

    Falcone will increase his share of the Wild at some point.
     
  8. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Nah. He's extensively leveraged from buying the Penthouse mansion. :D
     
  9. Beef03

    Beef03 Active Member

    That's absolutely fair enough, but now to build a brand new NHL ready building they are looking ball park of $400-mil, due to rising costs of everything. That is roughly what the Oilers are looking at for the building alone, not counting the entire downtown project which tops out at around $1 billion.
    I personally think they would have been better served to leave it so that the building could be expanded to meet NHL standards. it would cost a bit more than their current set up, but it wouldn't close the book on an NHL franchise for say 30 years.
     
  10. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Leipold is listed as one of Boots' creditors.
     
  11. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Which queen - Victoria? ;D

    wokka-wokka-wokka.....
     
  12. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Apropos of nothing .... every time he's referred to by his nickname, I think, "Hey, didn't that guy get banned?"

    ;D
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page