1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NBA Finals Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Chuck~Taylor, Jun 2, 2007.

?

Who you got?

  1. Spurs

    30 vote(s)
    76.9%
  2. Cavs

    9 vote(s)
    23.1%
  1. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Oops, sorry, I misread your post.

    Re: Spurs, the reason I don't want to see them win is simple: They've won it before, and outside of the Jordan Bulls, I've always pulled for underdogs in the NBA. Of course, the Suns debacle probably helped to shape my opinion this season, but with these two teams, I would have been rooting on the Cavs regardless.
     
  2. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Couldn't be more competitive if the score was 1-0 after 47:53
     
  3. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    You tellin' me A-Rod and Pujols don't have smaller strike zones?
     
  4. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    ARod took a called strike yesterday, with a pitch just above his ankle.

    I said it before, I'll say it again: Worst Finals sweep ever. One team can't score. The other won't score. And both teams are boring the nation. I posted the following on two other threads:
     
  5. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    Spurs get they're 4th.
    Stupid stupid plays down the strech made by LeBron and the Cavs. They had the chance to win this game(again), but they couldn't come through. But oh well. The better team won.
    Tim Duncan, 31 years old, 4 rings. Wow.

    P.S. My friend just called me and said "Chuck....Robert Horry's penis is magnetically attracted to Championship rings)
     
  6. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    And France is goin' crazy right now.
    Tony Parker gets the Finals MVP.

    HEY STEVIE NASH, WHERE YOU AT?
     
  7. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    No Drive, no Shot, no Fumble, just a straight, old-fashioned beatdown.
     
  8. Cousin Jeffrey

    Cousin Jeffrey Active Member

    Wow, if I would've taken Spurs minus three points, I'd be a little upset.
     
  9. JackyJackBN

    JackyJackBN Guest

    I didn't see five seconds of this finals...maybe three on a blowby this evening...but Chuck, I've never understood your Nash rash. He's a pretty nice player; do you think the Cavs would have fared better with him on their team getting the ball to Bron Bron and making an occasional shot or layup?

    The MVP stuff, that's just noise; I don't buy it.
     
  10. HejiraHenry

    HejiraHenry Well-Known Member

    Steve Nash + Cleveland = Spurs still win, but probably have to go to 7 to do it.
     
  11. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    It's just a little battle me and Rok have(He continues to say that he's the better than Kobe which is proposterous).

    I'm just pointing out to him that the two players that own him(Billups and Parker) have finals MVPs. Nash has yet to make the Finals.
     
  12. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    I'd just like to know how, exactly, the Spurs qualify as a dynasty. Four title in nine years is impressive, but consider: 1. They've never won consecutive titles and 2. They've never even been to the finals in consecutive years.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page