1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NFL Week 2 Running Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Tommy_Dreamer, Sep 10, 2008.

  1. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    No. Clearly this is a job for ...

    [​IMG]

    WLAT!
     
  2. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    Were you just reading my conversation with Sam Mills? Because I think I made all those points when he was trying to tell me the "pieces" were all there.
     
  3. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    2008 Browns = 2008 Indians - Cliff Lee
     
  4. CitizenTino

    CitizenTino Active Member

    Nope, just venting my own personal disgust with this franchise. I mean, your general manager comes out and says this is the biggest game your team has ever played since the current regime came aboard, you're in a must-win game on national TV against your archrival (a team you haven't beat since Tim Couch was your QB) and THAT is the effort you come up with?

    The name on the door is "Pretender."
     
  5. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    The whole isn't coming close to outplaying the sum of its better parts.
     
  6. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    Right. But rarely in sports does that happen, Sam. All-star teams aren't meant for week-in, week-out teamwork.

    I see no chemistry on this team. At all. It's like everyone's at odds.
     
  7. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    Whoa, IJAG ... not a fan of All-Star teams, either. If that were the case, the Redskins and Raiders would have fared much better over the last generation, given their owners fall in love too easily with big names.

    Every team needs those glue players, the ones who may never make a Pro Bowl but bust their butts and garner respect from teammates and even the occasional opponent. A couple of overachievers and those with a strong locker room presence - even if they're not starters - tend to help.

    All I said was that Cleveland seemed to have more pieces than your average 0-2 team. Not extraordinary, but not a team in need of solid drafts for years simply to upgrade a sorry roster.
     
  8. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    I'd settle for one solid draft.
     
  9. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Hey they got Brady Quinn last year. So, you know, you've got that.
     
  10. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    Then Derek Anderson outplayed him to get the starting nod. But for those draftniks, what was out there where the Browns got Quinn that would start and make a difference right away?
     
  11. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    It wasn't even Anderson outplaying him, it was Quinn getting horrible advice and holding out.

    You or I would have started over Quinn given the amount of practice he got last summer. Then Anderson blew up.
     
  12. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    I dunno. My arm surprises some people, but my mobility makes Dan Marino looks like a gazelle. ;D

    No doubt the holdout was dumb, but don't you think, more than a year later, that if he really were better, that Brady Quinn would be starting by now?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page