1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NHL 2013: Off-Season Running Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Gehrig, Jun 15, 2012.

  1. JosephC.Myers

    JosephC.Myers Active Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Not crying poverty for the players at all. However, I just have a problem with the owners paying out big salaries and only realizing down the line that maybe we shouldn't have done that.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    AFAICT, the owners want a salary cap that is workable for the small-market teams and let the large-market teams pocket the huge profits that result.
     
  3. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    True enough. The whole concept of a salary cap should prevent owners from tripping over themselves when it comes to ridiculous contracts.
     
  4. Liut

    Liut Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Agreed. The NHLPA must recognize 57-percent of hockey-related revenue to the players is not going to remain the status-quo. A few owners must accept reality, unless they want to go back to a 12-team (1967-68) league.

    St. Louis lost $20 million last year with mostly sellout crowds. Head of the new ownership group, Tom Stillman, is quoted in the Post-Dispatch saying the Blues will be a small-to-medium-sized, locally-owned business.

    Something has to, and will, give.
     
  5. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Revenue sharing.
     
  6. Liut

    Liut Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    If I'm an owner, I'll share some. But not a majority. It's my business and I'm interested in turning a profit.

    I'm also going to ask my colleagues Ed Snider and Craig Leipold, "What the hell are you doing?"
     
  7. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Then don't have a cap and spend what you like. You can't limit what players can make and not have real revenue sharing. There is such a wide gap from the halves and halve nots that I think are better going to a baseball style luxury tax system.
     
  8. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    57 percent seems way to high. Anyone know what the NFL and NBA split is? I think it's much lower.
     
  9. Liut

    Liut Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Mind explaining this statement in more detail? Thanks.
     
  10. Liut

    Liut Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

     
  11. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    Okay, then if I'm a player, I'm not accepting any sort of salary cap. It's my career and labor, and I'm interested in negotiating my fair value.
     
  12. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Re: NHL 2012: Off-Season Running Thread

    You are limiting what a player can make, if you are doing that you better be willing to share your revenue with each other.

    Are you one big business or 30 individual ones? If you're 30 individual ones then there should be no cap and each team can fend for themselves like every other business in the world.

    Crosby makes 8.7, what would fair market it pay him, 20, 25 mill?

    I have no problem if it comes down but it better come with better revenue sharing.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page