1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Offseason baseball Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Elliotte Friedman, Oct 5, 2017.

  1. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    As an Orioles fan, I'm all for moving Machado now if the haul is right. It's clear there's no chance he'll be in Baltimore after 2018.
     
    Vombatus likes this.
  2. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    They also get revenue sharing money which they can choose to pocket if they wish.

    The Deputy Dawg isn't wrong here, of course there's an advantage to being able to spend more but the advantage is not even close to what it use to be. Organizations are much smarter than they use to be with not handing out idiotic long term deals to older players.

    I'll take baseball's system over any of them, if you want to spend, you can and you will get hit with the luxury tax. If you can't afford to compete, than move or sell your team. The Marlins are profitable and a disgrace.

    Baseball has never been healthier.
     
  3. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    The pile jumper isn't completely wrong here. Baseball reduced the advantage large markets have in baseball, but that advantage is still significant. MLB is healthy. It just isn't as healthy as the NFL, even with the massive public relations issues that have been hurting television ratings.

    And that is in part because of a perception which is based in reality. Every team has the same opportunity to succeed in the NFL, but that is not the case in MLB. The Patriots aren't buying their way to the top. They are outsmarting the opposition. They are earning their success.
     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    So the built-in advantage is fine because some markets can choose to lose money every year to keep up with the others? That's bullshit. There are certainly some owners who do a terrible job in baseball and that is part of the equation as well. I've been critical of the Pirates, for example, for failing to spend what is necessary. They built a nice team that was a contender, making the playoffs three years in a row. But instead of making the financial commitment to take advantage of that window of opportunity, they went the other way and cut payroll even as they raised ticket prices and, predictably, the team fell apart.
     
  5. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  6. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Looks like cards giving up hard-throwing Sandy Alcantara and maybe a minor-league hitter.
     
  7. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

  8. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Nope. And it will be interesting to see how well he does when he's not hitting behind Stanton in the lineup. Sez here: not as well.
     
    Chef2 likes this.
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Cuz washed-up Pujols ain't enough:

     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  10. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    They could trade for Matt Kemp too, and then they really got a stew goin'.
     
  11. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    He won’t be an Oriole, But there’s no baseball reason. 10/400 is stupid for anybody. It if it’s the market the Os need to pony up. Moron Angelos paid for KO Davis. It’s a firesale now and everyone knows it. Wait until July and extort someone. Ur Angelos won’t trade within the division

    I hate Angelos more than just about any owner in sports.
     
  12. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    How does hitting behind Stanton help him?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page