OK. Serious BALCO questions... Please no idiocy

Boom, you better stick to remedial spelling.

 

Good one Beake - I had not heard that one before.

 

If redundancy were a disqualifier, how many posts would you have, Boom?

 

so says the man who pretty much has been a one topic poster since Obama announced his candacy.

 

Creamora hasn't hurled insults in every direction? Come on, Boom. And it isn't always just in response. He has come here in attack mode to push his agenda and proven time and again that while he may have some information to offer, he has no real interest in telling the truth.

Creamora wants to push his version of things at all costs and has proven that not a word he types can be trusted, so let's please refrain from trying to paint him as a victim here.

 

Boom, Boom, the boss of the room.

The irony, of course, eludes you.

 

Z

zeke zeke, I know of no one more meek.

 

Well, it does rhyme, but I don't think it scans.

But an A for effort.

 

Why does every BALCO-related thread have to devolve into a Creamora thread? Some of you guys seem like you'd rather get into a pissing match with him than actually participate in an intelligent discussion. Try staying on the topic -- like Ragu said, no idiocy -- instead of getting into this juvenile back-and-forth bullshit with him and about him. It's pathetic.

 

Thank you Broadway - that was my point as well .

 

Actually, most of them start as creamora threads. And while some of the responses are cheap shots, the level of bullshit in the man's posts are a legitimate point.

 

As I've said before, I'm not one of you, but I've worked in the media. That said, I don't understand why creamora is shouted down. Sure, he has an agenda. So what? If any of you had a source for a story who had an agenda would you completely blow them off, even if they were part of the story, or would you try and filter what they told you. What public figure doesn't have an agenda?