1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Olympics 2012, in Londontown

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, Jun 7, 2012.

  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    That's where an official's judgment comes in Like the saying you could call holding on every play in the NFL.

    A good official has to know when to toe the line and when to allow a little bit of latitude.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Devil's advocate:

    How strange was the George Brett pine tar call?

    How often, and when, does someone get hit with an illegal stick call?
     
  3. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    The kinesio tape is getting a little ridiculous. Some Russian diver had it in a line from shoulders to backside. He lined himself like a golf ball.
     
  4. Elliotte Friedman

    Elliotte Friedman Moderator Staff Member

    Good debate, Az.

    I'd say this: on appeal, the Brett call was overturned, allowing the original HR to stand. If I recall correctly, the AL president said he didn't violate the "spirit of the rule." Anyway, considering we really haven't seen anything close to that before or since indicates that's the kind of ruling that should never be made.

    As for the illegal stick, the other Kings players always blamed McSorely for that. Why don't we see those calls now? I have a feeling there's kind of a gentlemen's agreement on that.
     
  5. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    If you get a chance, check out Stephan Feck's dive.......
     
  6. Rusty Shackleford

    Rusty Shackleford Active Member

    I'm sure Soccer Canada would disagree. I have no thoughts one way or the other because I know very little about soccer. I'm just saying, consider the source.
     
  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Part of what distinguishes calls like these is that they're almost always pointed out by opponents in the course of play, rather than by officials. As was the case here.
     
  8. Iron_chet

    Iron_chet Well-Known Member

    Nice, so Wambach is a snitch as well as a hack / still bitter :)/
     
  9. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    "Make sure you don't slow the play too much," from an assistant referee at halftime, is not a warning. A warning would be the head referee saying "from this point forward you have six seconds to get rid of the ball, and if you take seven I call a foul." Referees talk to players all the time with similar warnings.
     
  10. rmanfredi

    rmanfredi Active Member

    And for the "you enforce the rule to the letter of the law" people, would you be OK with making the call without a warning? Because there's nothing in the rules that says the ref has to warn a player before awarding a foul.
     
  11. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Hell no you don't make that call without a warning. Unless you've decided ahead of time to make it a point of emphasis and you call it the very first time you see it in the whole game.
     
  12. kingcreole

    kingcreole Active Member

    Major controversy avoided in women's volleyball. Quarterfinal between Brazil and Russia went five sets. Brazil led 11-9 when an attack landed so far in that it didn't even touch the white sideline. You could see court between the line and where the ball landed. And it was called out. What should have been a 12-9 Brazilian lead was now 11-10. Brazil fought off six match points before rightfully winning.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page