On-camera talent?

zufer · Jun 12, 2006

Lugnuts said:

Now you must cover that cut. But you don't have video of that game back on August 12, 1983-- nobody does. It would be dishonest and unethical to cover it with video of another game. To do so would be the equivalent of a print person using a quote out of context. No other cover shots work because he's talking about a specific play.

What do you cover it with?
Click to expand...

Some footage taped later of William Hurt shedding a tear...

markvid · Jun 12, 2006

Luggie, I love you....

;D

heyabbott · Jun 13, 2006

Lugnuts said:

Now you can educate the people in the bar...

"Sometimes they have to do it that way.Â They have no choice."
Click to expand...

They certainly have a choice, don't cut away to Mike Wallace clenching his teeth and rocking forward.

alleyallen · Jun 13, 2006

heyabbott said:

Lugnuts said:

Now you can educate the people in the bar...

"Sometimes they have to do it that way. They have no choice."
Click to expand...

They certainly have a choice, don't cut away to Mike Wallace clenching his teeth and rocking forward.
Click to expand...

Or Jeremy Schapp looking empty and vacuous.

MacDaddy · Jun 13, 2006

heyabbott said:

It's always been a pet peeve of mine watching 60 minutes. Why the hell do I need a reaction shot from Mike Wallace or Dan Rather or Ed Bradley? Ask the fucking questions and let the viewer watch and listen to the response without attempting to influence the audience by your facial expressions.
Click to expand...

They do it on "60 Minutes" so you know the interviewer is still alive.

Log in or Sign up

On-camera talent?

zufer Active Member

markvid Guest

heyabbott Well-Known Member

alleyallen Guest

MacDaddy Active Member

Share This Page

Members

Useful Searches