1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Paging Lynn Hoppes ...

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Riptide, Jul 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    Publishers post here?
     
  2. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member


    Just another Scarlett O'Hara, looking to whip the mule, one more time.
     
  3. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty New Member

    obviously you don't care if the person you sleep with shits themselves every night, do you?
     
  4. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Paging Lynn Hoppes ...

    Paging Lynn Hoppes ...

    Paging Lynn Hoppes ...
     
  5. Rockbottom

    Rockbottom Well-Known Member

    That Lynn himself hasn't chimed into this thread so far has GOT to be a record -- and could possibly indicate what is up for him in Bristol. Not saying, just saying ...

    rb
     
  6. PEteacher

    PEteacher Member

    Let's be honest here.

    There was nothing of consequence that was being plagiarized.

    Lynn Hoppes copied and pasted some useless information from wikipedia.

    We're talking about descriptions of movies or plays, not quotes copied from other writers, made-up information, or stealing other people's work. And when I say "work", I don't need inconsequential wikipedia entries.

    Really, in the grand scheme of things, there are much, much bigger fish to fry in the journalism industry than this.
     
  7. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I see it more as being "embarrassingly lazy" than being "plagiarism" but I also don't think it's ever OK to cut and paste anything and pass it off as your own. It's pretty low on the plagiarism scale, but any level of plagiarism is never acceptable.

    Yeah, there are bigger fish to fry in journalism. I think the next big scandal will be when places start finding out how much stuff has been completely fabricated. Granted, that's extremely difficult to prove, which is why I think it's so widespread these days.

    But on no level does that excuse what Hoppes did.
     
  8. Rhody31

    Rhody31 Well-Known Member

    Nothing of consequence?
    You're a disgrace if you believe what you just posted.
     
  9. yonaker

    yonaker New Member

    Right-on Rhody. It's plagiarism, plain and simple. Stealing someone's ideas? Plagiarism. Stealing the (virtually) exact wording used to describe something, even if it's just historical summary or description? Plagiarism. One may seem worse than the other, but it's all plagiarism. College students get in trouble for this stuff all the time. To excuse it from a journalist, especially one in this position, is shameful. Perhaps there are bigger fish to fry, as you say. But plagiarism in journalism ain't no guppy.
     
  10. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Thanks for stopping by, Lynn.
     
  11. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I don't always plagiarize, but when I do, I plagiarize from credible sources.
     
  12. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Apparently, this is completely off the radar in Bristol. A friend who works there said nobody has even mentioned it and said he'd be stunned if anything happened to Hoppes.

    It's possible that the higher-ups are huddling behind the scenes and deciding what course of action to take, but he told me, "That's not usually how things are done around here. If someone is in trouble, everybody usually knows about it."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page