1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pay threshold for managers to rise to 50K

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Baron Scicluna, Jun 30, 2015.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    If you believe the company can survive with fewer workers, I suppose that's true. My observation is that most of the companies we see in this income equation are staffed to the minimum and don't have a lot of flex to reduce overall labor hours.
     
  2. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    When that manager looks at his or her paycheck, it reads Pay Rate: $13.00 hr; Hours: 40.
     
  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    They won't reduce hours or workers. All they'll do is change the way the accounting goes.
     
  4. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    So your premise is that this regulation won't affect anything?
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Then they risk losing the employee who suddenly sees a huge pay decrease (if a nominal one for the time being). Good employees do have options.
     
    cranberry likes this.
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I still say the hypothetical 26K assistant manager who is required to work an average of 60 hours a week wins if he/she is limited to 40 hours (even if pay is slightly decreased).

    That way our hypothetical manager can clock overtime or get another part-time job.

    Some places really abuse these people.
     
    JimmyHoward33 likes this.
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Actually it reads Pay Rate: $12.50 hr; Hours: 40. And it also reads: Total Gross: $500

    But you think that manager is going to get a paycheck that reads this way:

    RT Hours: 40 RT Rate: $7.13
    OT Hours: 20 OT Rate: $10.71
    Total Gross: $500

    And feel like his/her compensation went down?

    To believe that, you have to believe that the manager is fixated on one and only number ... the hourly rate. You have to believe that he/she is wholly ignorant of the number of hours he/she works.
     
    YankeeFan likes this.
  8. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Or have less motivated employees. And if employees leave, companies will need to find and train new employees who, by definition, weren't the company's first choice. Costs to consider.
     
  9. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    No, that manager is going to see "I'm only making $7.13? Shoot, I can go make $10 here!" So it becomes either a raise (based on continuing to work 60 hours at the other place) or a lifestyle bump (based on making the same money in only 40 hours).
     
    bigpern23 likes this.
  10. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    Actually, it would read:
    RT Hours: 40 RT Rate: $7.25 (federal minimum wage)
    OT Hours: 20 OT Rate $10.88
    Total Gross: $507.5

    And I have absolutely no doubt that most salaried workers who put in more than 40 hours per week without punching a clock are ignorant of how many hours they actually work.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2016
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Ooops, you're right.
     
  12. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Bowing out because I'm tired of arguing this. To sum up:

    1) I predict there will be little to no effect.
    2) Y'all are predicting there will be a substantial effect.

    That about it? Oh wait, one last thing ...

    3) I am right.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page