1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Penn State Latest

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Azrael, Jul 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Was confused by your use of the present tense.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Well, 'forgiveness' and 'punishment' still travel on separate but parallel tracks in most religions, including Catholicism. Punish the sin, forgive the sinner.
     
  3. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Good.
     
  4. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Not being snarky here in the least, but to respond to this accurately would be the mother of all thread jacks. Suffice it to say that the phrase "punish the sin ..." misses the mark substantially as regards Christian (and Catholic) theology.
     
  5. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    I'll just add that it should be "hate the sin, not the sinner." And forgiveness and punishment aren't mutually exclusive.
     
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    In what way?

    We punish the theft, but forgive the thief.
     
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    In Christian theology (and several others) all sin, regardless of its severity, is a sin against God. Given that, punishment is to be reserved for God. That's a big piece of Christian theology. Because man's sin was an affront to, indeed a rejection of, God, man would never be capable of offering up a sufficient atonement for his sin. Only Jesus, as both man and God, was able to pull that off. That's the idea.

    Apologies for the sermon. Absolutely not trying to convert anyone here (but, hey, maybe I'll get a little clubhouse credit if I do? :D). Just trying to paint an accurate picture about the theological point I'd been trying to make.

    Back to making jocular comments about old tenured assholes. I'm on much more solid ground when that's what I am talking about.
     
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Christ asks that our forgiveness be unconditional.

    But neither Christ nor the Bible expect man (though fallen) to live in a state of lawlessness.

    We - society - punish the sin (theft, murder, etc.) and are asked to forgive the sinner.

    Punishment and forgiveness exist simultaneously but separately as a matter of social fact.

    Absolution is another story.
     
  9. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    As are old tenured assholes. :D

    Not dismissing what you've written ... it's just that, while stimulating, our turn here (largely my fault) is getting very far afield from the thread. Don't wanna be blamed (or feel guilty) if it gets locked as a result.
     
  10. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    OK. But I'll remind you it was the Second Council of Nicea (ca 787 CE) which instructed us all to "Stand up. Punch back."
     
  11. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    I thought it was the Judean People's Front?
     
  12. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Nope. People's Front of Judea.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page