1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Plasma vs. LCD

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by bigpern23, Aug 19, 2006.

  1. Pete Incaviglia

    Pete Incaviglia Active Member

    I want something I'll watch from seven feet away. It will be mainly sports (and network/cable TV) and will never be used for video games.

    I'm thinking 42 or 46 inches should suffice.
     
  2. beefncheddar

    beefncheddar Guest

    I've had no problems with mine:

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=844033
     
  3. Sconnie

    Sconnie Member

    I think debating the difference between the two in this sense is like deciding if what's better between a BJ or sex. Both are great and the negatives of both are really negligible.
     
  4. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    I dunno. I'm glad I spent the time I did on avsforum before I got the WEGA. Because anything I've had before pales in comparison.
     
  5. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    My post total is so going back to zero by morning....
     
  6. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    My post total is so going back to zero by morning....
     
  7. Dignan

    Dignan Guest

    Plasma is definitely the way to go if you want the best picture quality possible, but bear in mind that not all plasmas are created equal.

    Sony, Panasonic and LG are ones you can trust. I have a 42-inch LG Plasma and love it. Vizio I'd stay away from.
     
  8. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    I think I got one of the last CRTs w/HDTV on the market. I plan to use it as long as possible until the bugs are worked out of the plasmas ... of course, the prices coming back to Earth would help, too.
     
  9. ArnoldBabar

    ArnoldBabar Active Member

    Based on what? They test out really well. In a situation like this, cheaper doesn't necessarily mean inferior -- it sometimes just means they figured out how to produce the same technology less expensively. I don't have a Vizio, but by all accounts they're good sets.
     
  10. T2

    T2 Member

    Consumer Reports may have reconsidered. From page 25 of the December edition:

    "Many bulb failures occurred early in a set's life and appeared to have been covered by a standard warranty." Also, "Even though rear-projection sets have had a higher repair rate than flat panels, our data show that most rear-projection sets have been trouble-free for their first few years. Many of those that did need repair were covered by a standard warranty. That suggests there's less than a 1-in-10 chance you'll have to pay for a repair on a new projection TV. Overall, an extended warranty seems like a poor investment for most consumers."
     
  11. Pete Incaviglia

    Pete Incaviglia Active Member

    I resurrect this thread for a couple reasons:

    1) is 1080p still the gold standard for flat screen HD TVs?

    2) what "dynamic contrast ratio" should I be looking for?
     
  12. Madhavok

    Madhavok Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't buy anything unless it was 1080p.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page