1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Possible GOP vice presidents

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by deskslave, Jan 29, 2008.

  1. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    He won't take it because it won't be offered. Choosing him reveals much of McCain's campaign so far to be a big lie. He's not that transparent.
     
  2. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Good - he won't take it ,We don't want him.
     
  3. Choosing Hagel shows a commitment to move forward/work together (blah, blah) despite differences in opinion.
     
  4. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Market's moving away from the doctronaire GOPers, and fast.

    They can sit there and suck their thumbs, or they can get in the damn game.
     
  5. Maverick

    Maverick New Member

    I know it's been mentioned at some point, but Crist makes a heck of a lot of sense. He's got an approval rating around 65 percent in the Sunshine State, and Florida obviously has played a pretty big role of late.
     
  6. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Still eligible to be elected Vice-President, or President.

    :eek: :eek: :eek:

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Then why would Hagel turn it down?

    I assume you'd like the Dem. nominee to take Joe Leiberman as a running mate for the same (blah blah) reasons.
     
  8. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Dems won't go near Joe, and we all know why.
     
  9. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    I know. That was the point.
     
  10. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Check.

    Onward.
     
  11. Oh, so now Chuck Hagel isn't conservative enough.
    Signing onto Fredo's clusterfuck in perpetuity is the litmus test?
    Good luck with that one this fall.
     
  12. RedSmithClone

    RedSmithClone Active Member

    Of course not. He disagrees with his party on one issue. Thus he is not conservative enough.

    Much like you continue to say that because Lieberman disagrees with his party on one issue he isn't liberal enough. And I know we can look at the little i next to his name now and say he isn't a Democrat, but we're all big boys and girls on here. I think we know that when it walks and talks like one, is sure as hell is one.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page