1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jan 20, 2021.

  1. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    What does allowing our treasury to borrow trillions of dollars more and deficit spend -- what the debt ceiling is about -- have to do with agreeing to pay "debts that have already been promised"? As a country we owe tens of trillions of dollars; we've borrowed money that has already been spend on things we didn't pay for.

    Heading into the debt ceiling nonsense, cumulative revenue (what the treasury took in from taxes mostly) was $2.7 trillion so far this year. Net interest on the massive amount of debt we had run up was at about $365 billion so far (and will end up costing somewhere on the order of $750 billion this year; more if they actually let interest rates keep rising, but that won't happen because they won't have the stomach for the consequences). The debt ceiling had zero to do with making good on our debts. We owed $365 billion (so far) on our debt, and had collected $2.7 trillion in revenue.

    What the debt ceiling was about. ... was politicians who fiscally want to keep robbing from our future to dig a hole deeper that is very deep already.They have trillions of dollars of actual revenue beyond servicing the debt we are already servicing to waste however they want -- handouts, defense spending, crony capitalism to reward their supporters, whatever it is they are robbing generations ahead for. But they want to spend trillions of dollars beyond that. ... and want to borrow more to do it. A debt ceiling doesn't allow that. A debt ceiling is also a worthless construct, when it is discussed the way it has been on this thread (and by the country as a whole).

    FWIW, the fantasy that we are living (and the way this gets discussed demonstrates that the general populace is just ignorant) has benefited over the last 3 presidencies and Congresses from massive debt monetization -- zero interest rate policy. They could have used that as an opportunity to actually pay down some of the massive debt the country already had. Instead. ... they did what politicians do. They made populist promises, sold "free" everything. ... and wasted trillions more that sent our accumulated debt spiraling out of control. The last two decades or so required that interest rates be price fixed to zero to keep the interest on our debt from swallowing up a much larger percentage of our tax revenues. And now? A little inflation problem (caused by the fantasy I am talking about) made it so that they have been forced to allow interest rates to rise. That means the interest expense has been rising. ... and that is happening as our elected representatives just came to an agreement to borrow trillions more while congratulating themselves for it.



    If they keep acting the way they have been. ... they will end up pushing interest rates back toward zero to monetize all of the debt that people don't want to accept is a disaster for our long term health. Get used to stagflation at best and an eventual credit crisis.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2023
  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  3. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    As I wrote, the time to debate programs that will have to be funded or plans to reduce funds available is before those debts are incurred, not after the fact with doomsday drama.

    Debt has a useful and necessary function. The legislative and executive branches need to do better to keep it reasonable. This hyped up debt ceiling precipice doesn’t seem to make that more likely.
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    OK. So, you can't spend anything without being able to pay for it? How about a balanced budget amendment?

    Because when you are Joe Biden or Kevin McCarthy or Chuck Schumer or anyone who is making these decisions, YOU don't bear the consequences of the irresponsible behavior. ... you're playing with Monopoly money. But you certainly benefit from it personally. You literally get to spend billions of dollars corruptly to reward whoever it is that has given you your power, and it gets tacked onto the cumulative debt. The answer to that is voters voting them out. ... but the American public is dumb as fuck, dumber than ever. ... and people of all stripes are so easily seduced by populism and promises, and then remain clueless that their lives suck precisely because of the consequences of what they keep buying into. It is driving the country to ruin.
     
  5. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Spillane is one of the easy marks Trump has fleeced for 50 years. Talk about doing stuff without consequences like Ragu mentioned above — Trump is the all-time leader in that division.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  6. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    Twitter admits in court that Fat Orange Hitler's claims of govt-controlled censorship were bullshit.

    R&A says Turnberry won't host Open.

    Arizona Maricopa Supervisor (R) declines to run for reelection, citing harassment.

    Lin Wood fined for criminal contempt.

    (Mostly) Happy Friday!
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2023
    matt_garth and 2muchcoffeeman like this.
  7. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

  8. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    this creature is sick, depraved and a true mental deficient.

     
  9. Brooklyn Bridge

    Brooklyn Bridge Well-Known Member

    The leading GOP candidate for president, ladies and gentlemen.
     
  10. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member


    [​IMG]
     
    2muchcoffeeman and garrow like this.
  11. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Is that a Picasso?
     
  12. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page