1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jan 20, 2021.

  1. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  2. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Now we’ll see if Gee’s theory about Supremes being politicians too holds true. Anyone in the political mainstream wants this guy gone.
     
  3. Deskgrunt50

    Deskgrunt50 Well-Known Member

    Think the one listed above in the DC circuit court, not SCOTUS. These things happen with so many trials for a felonious ex-president.
     
  4. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    It's a matter of pure power. The majority of the Supreme Court takes its adjective all too seriously. Giving Trump immunity for crimes committed as President makes him supreme to them if he gets elected again. I don't think they'd do that. They like ruling the roost. A President who'd ignore them is a direct threat to them.
     
  5. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Yeah I was certainly wrong in predicting January 6 wasn’t I?
     
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  7. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  9. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    This rando guy's challenge of the interrupting a session of a congressional proceeding charge against him makes me worry. It's a fucking law spelled out in English. The fact that 4 SCOTUS justices thought it needed discussing would be gobsmacking if you didn't realize the makeup of the court.

    The decision could let up to 300 J6 defendants walk and could accrue to Twitchy's benefit too.

    If I'm Jack Smith, I drop that charge immediately and go hard on the other three. The point is to snare a conviction before November 2024. If that charge stays on the docket, it'll be the end of June before a decision is even announced. The trial starts in March.
     
  10. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Surprised that's not higher
     
    garrow likes this.
  11. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Oh, is that what you predicted would happen? Weren’t you also throwing in some bullshit about how SCOTUS would side with Trump?
     
  12. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Tweeter must mean the national election.

    GOP is going to win Iowa’s electoral votes.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page