President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

If I end up in hell, it will be for liking this post.

 

I suggest the Democrats win by enough to not have everything come down to Georgia.

Cobb County election board meeting ends after someone yells 'heil Hitler'

 

He prefers the company of people who share his politics these days, though I think he still posts here once in a while, too.

 

Man, the US has lost the plot completely when this shit is normal. I fear the world my kids will grow up in.

 

Maybe instead of the filibuster, we can just allow Senators to delay proceedings for a day or so, but only if they drop an HH or an n-bomb.

 

Of course I’ve had it in the ear before.

 

Every right-winger has a close family member who opposes them. Why do you support them?

Lynda Carter, Original Wonder Woman, Tells Arizonans Not To Vote For Her Sister

 

He didn’t seem to be a very good teacher if I remember correctly.

 

Presenting the merchandise for inspection.

 

Should a ‘Diverse’ Campus Mean More Conservatives?

In his influential 1994 paper “Political Psychology or Politicized Psychology: Is the Road to Scientific Hell Paved With Good Moral Intentions?,” Philip E. Tetlock argued that the field was in danger of simply reproducing (or being seen as reproducing) favored political talking points. Too many researchers, he argued, were blind to the ways their biases were baked into their methodologies and premises, and the ways dissent was discouraged.

In an email, Tetlock, who now teaches at the University of Pennsylvania, described how in 1986, as a young professor, he published a paper questioning the assumptions behind some research into “symbolic racism,” defined by researchers as abstract forms of prejudice that fall short of overt racism.

“At a conference that year, a leading symbolic racism researcher asked me, slightly menacingly, ‘Do you have tenure yet?’” Tetlock recalled. “Of course, this is not Gulag Archipelago repression but it is enough to keep many academics in line.”