1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    garrow likes this.
  2. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    No, she will: this is a convenient way for her to bail out, play the victim, and avoid getting ass-stomped off the stage by the other candidates, particularly Kamala Harris, who I suspect will be quite helpful in pointing out the Orange syrup dripping off her lips and recounting her romantic trip to Trump Tower on Nov. 21, 2016 to slurp his toadstool and beg for a position in his cabinet. She needs to be fucking terminated from the Democratic Party and thrown off the stage ass first.

    It's time for the Kamala-Liz tag team to line up and plant the boots in her ass.
     
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Rick Wilson take some folks to the woodshed. Pretty good tweet string.

     
  4. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    I'm thinking today about all the horrible shit that we already know. Can you imagine what we don't know?
     
  5. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    You mean Former Chairman of the House Rules Committee Pete Sessions.
     
  6. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    In 100 million ways, they do. As it relates to military policy, he's odd, too - in the fact that he doesn't do what hawks want.

    One would think Democrats would be cool with that. Strange bedfellows, as it were, on principle.

    They're not, though. Now, the hawkish soldier's opinion is useful to them.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Any country is free to swoop to the Kurds' rescue. They probably won't, of course, which is no reflection on them. Just the US.

    I'm kind of an non-interventionist. Are you more situational?
     
  8. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    I don't imagine it's as much as we think. I really don't. The Trump administration is the leakiest organization in the history of presidents, the man belches everything he thinks on Twitter as it is, and our intelligence/state agencies want to remove him from the presidency by any means. Could there be something? Sure. But the CIA, FBI and state department do not want the man there. They're looking for that something, and if they find it, we'll know about it. Just like we did with Ukraine.
     
  9. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Alma, it's not a question of intervening or not. US troops are still in Syria. A portion of them were relocated so as to allow Erdogan's offensive against the Kurds. This was done by Trump with consultation with no one but Erdogan. It places US forces there in more jeopardy, not less by introducing yet another crossfire in a multi-sided conflict.
     
  10. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Courage.

     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  12. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    A statement by the Secretary of Defense he wanted to attribute to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for (something or other, who knows?)

    And I suspect our NATO allies responded to his call for solidarity with a hearty "go fuck yourself."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page