1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

    I just want to chime in on the Times or Post story that documented how much Trump charges the government to use his property.

    They even have him charging the government to him to eat at his own property.

    This. Is. So. Illegal.

    In a sane world, he is asked to leave the White House immediately.

    He’s using his properties for profit off the government while he is president.

    There is no debate here. It’s illegal.
     
  2. lakefront

    lakefront Well-Known Member

    They only live by the parts that are convenient for them.
     
    BitterYoungMatador2 likes this.
  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    The suspects are very fine people.
     
    garrow likes this.
  4. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    Believing a 2,000 year old book that’s been interpreted and re-interpreted, and re-interpreted....and re-interpreted as gospel while calling shit with a dozen sources on the record, “fake news.”

    But I’m the embarrassing one.
     
    lakefront likes this.
  5. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    One day we are going to learn just how much we have to pay for him to golf and to travel to his properties. It is an absolute disgrace that there is zero transparency.

    And that’s not even counting how many groups have events at his properties to curry favor.
     
    garrow likes this.
  6. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    Just a colossally stupid human being. How can you read that and think is he is qualified to be in office?
     
    garrow likes this.
  7. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

    Textualists and that whole pesky emolument clause. It's really more of a guideline than something actually written in the Constitution. Oh, no, wait. It is actually in the freakin Constitution.
     
  8. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

  9. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Im not laughing at that notion. His klan always seems to win the close ones.
     
  10. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    If you agreed with her politics you'd love her.

    I don't agree with all of her politics. But she's very qualified.
     
  11. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    And the ABA called her qualified. Makes you wonder about the record number of Trumpist judges deemed unqualified.
     
  12. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    She's absolutely qualified - and her lack of a track record is probably seen as a plus. I want a court with justices with varying and diverse backgrounds. Having nine Harvard and Yale grads who clerked for a SC justice then served the last 10 years on a court of appeals? How about some justices who actually worked with people on the other side of the bench?
     
    Donny in his element likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page