President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Companies should be free to unleash plumes of toxic smoke. Anyone affected can just take the offender to court. .... but hopefully the court is located in a town not affected by the plume of toxic smoke.

 

If you said, "regulating murder creates an unnecessary burden on our people; therefore let's not regulate murder, and affected people can just seek justice in our courts after the fact," yes - I would call you pro murder.

And no - I don't believe handing off the nuance of environmental regulations to congressional debate is a good idea.

 

We shouldn't "preemptively try to manage people's behaviors."

 

Does the court system have a good way to replace the freedom lost from being dead?

 

You people have issues.

 

I swear I remember Ragu once saying that if you get ill from eating tainted meat, it is your problem, nobody else's.

If i am wrong, I can be corrected.

 

Can you give us the search terms to find it? I don't want to spend too much time investigating the claim.

 

I know he once argued that if a company sold poison, the market would take care of it if enough people decided they didn't want to buy it.

 

Except this ...

... is remotely close.


How much of a drag on our economy are you willing to endure, for example, to keep industry from dumping mercury into the Shenandoah River and destroying - again - my favorite smallmouth river?

Is that worth even $1 in regulatory burden? Or is that too much?

Should I be content to just wait for yet another fish kill, and then sue?

 

There's a good bit of prestige that obtains when one is strung up by the sj.com strawman squad.