1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Now it's not even that the Clintons did things.

    It's that the Clintons would have done things.
     
    melock, Hermes and Iron_chet like this.
  2. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    As if YF wouldn't have screamed it out from the top of the John Hancock building if there was a hint of a whiff of a rumor of anything remotely like this involving HRC's connections.
     
  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    He was for it until he was against it, all in the course of the same day.
     
  4. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member

  5. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    We have a winner.

     
    Deskgrunt50 likes this.
  6. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Forget the Clintons. As I stipulated, ANY candidate would have welcomed such information.

    These people spend month after month and millions of dollars badmouthing (often grossly inaccurately) their political opponents, and now you think they would suddenly develop a conscience about possible true information that could damage said opponent. Just because of where the information came from.

    That's cute.
     
  7. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Yes, even if only acting out of self-interest.

    The Clintons are lawyers smart enough to understand the meeting's illegality and likelihood of it coming back to bite them in the ass later.

    The Trumps are not.
     
  8. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    There were 20 candidates for President for the 2016 election cycle. Only one campaign solicited help from a foreign power. One. The idea that any other candidate would have done the same is contradicted by the simple fact it's never happened before.
     
    Neutral Corner likes this.
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    The Dems paid a Brit, who subcontracted Russians, to dig up dirt on Trump. An unverified "dossier" was produced, was leaked to the press and published, and it served as the basis for an FBI investigation.

    The Trump campaign took a meeting that they did not "solicit". No negative information or payment was traded.

    Your statement is false, and contradicted by the facts.
     
  10. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    And what dirt did they find?

    Noth .... uhmmm wait.
     
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Yeah, but they could have. That's pretty much the same thing.
     
  12. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page