1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Meanwhile, in committee.



    [​IMG]
     
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  4. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    Please provide details.
     
  5. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    It was "narrow" in that it "narrowed" the number of people who would be TRULY FUCKED by the GOP health plan from 32 million to a much more realistic number. It was also accurate.
     
  6. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    A truer sentence about Paul Ryan has never been uttered. I hate Steve Bannon 0.001 percent less now.
     
  7. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  8. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    32 million people won't get catastrophic ailments. 32 million people would have to go to bed every night knowing that they and their families would be wiped out *if* they had a big time ailment.
     
  9. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Point, missed.

    But carry on. I'm sure there's a far greater number of people out there going, "Hmm, pay doc or buy new car?" than going "Hmm, pay doc or pay utilities?"
     
  10. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Ok, make it "One medical misfortune from truly fucked."
     
  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  12. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member






    "You had 52 people, you had 4 no's… Now, we might have had another one, someone in there. But the vote would have been if you look at it, 48-4. That's a pretty impressive vote by any standard. Yet you have a vote of 48-4 or something like that and you need more. That's pretty tough."

    Majority rule is now apparently rigged.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page