President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

I agree. I get why the US Attorney's Office thinks that a team of prosecutors that is separate from the investigation can handle the privilege questions in-house and that procedure has historically been used in other investigations where attorney-client privilege is being pierced by an investigation into the attorney's criminal activities. But the outward appearance of a neutral third party doing the review would be huge for maintaining public confidence in whatever result they're seeking and I have to imagine the evidence they have is striking given all the things you mentioned about obtaining the type of warrant they did.

 

Thanks!

 

The Southern District office stated in its argument that the concepts of fairness and due process mean that their investigation should proceed as it does in less publicized cases, with the use of the taint team. That's their argument.

 

I'm not sure they sound fun, exactly, in either context. Maybe I'm just not much of a taint guy. Or a team player for that matter.

 

Link?

 

I bet this felt like an orgasm for you.

 

Wow, I set that one up for you very nicely, didn't I?

 

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/pregnancy/prenatal-care/where-can-i-get-prenatal-care

 

It wouldn't accomplish that objective because the complaints are not made in good faith. Unless the special master is somebody like Jeanne Pirro, Trump and Co. are just going to smear whoever it is, too.

 

Perhaps not publicly, but the judge can ask to review the list and state the number for the record.