President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

There’s no evidence that the Trump campaign made a single decision based on “stolen data”.

 

LOL. This is funny. You actually have the chutzpah to talk about somebody else's dishonesty and claim that someone else is simply hoping others won't click on a link. You really are following President Trump's example in all things.

 

There is no evidence at all that they held on to it by inappropriate or illegal means. You made that up.

 

The. Investigation. Is. Still. Going. On.

There, I said it slowly.

 

Actually, there is some, but it's not enough to prove it. My point was that your claim that Clinton failed to react properly somehow disproves the theory is utter bulllshit.

 

Is this your way of admitting that you are fine with Russia interfering with elections in the United States as long as it gets you a result that you like, as it did in the 2016 presidential election? If so, I'm impressed. That is far more honesty than we usually get from you. It's disgusting and it proves that you care more about rooting for political laundry than you do the good of the United States, but at least it would be honest.

 

They either owned it, and held on to it — likely renting it out — which means they owned two homes, and likely had rental income, which would be unusual for a “poor” family.

Or, they held onto a rent controlled apartment, despite it not being their primary residence.

Choose one.

 

No, you care a little more than you should.

 

But people are wrong on the Internet!

I really don't care whether he's here or isn't here. That's a fact. People complaining that he's not here when he is here bothers me, yes.

 

Week 60: It’s the Names That Don’t Appear That Matter Most in New Indictments

 

I don't care who's here, who's not, who's banned, who's not. Whatever.

But, I do need to say this:

If Dick Whitman returns and doesn't come back as Don Draper, it's a missed opportunity.