President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Very fine people in Trumpville. There's absolutely no evidence that Trump or his people are racists. None.

52 percent of voters who supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election believed blacks are “less evolved” than whites, according to researchers at the Kellog School of Management.
https://www.theroot.com/how-the-republican-party-became-the-party-of-racism-1827779221

 

Kellog School of Management?

You gonna believe a study conducted by Tony the Tiger and Toucan Sam? Amirite, @YankeeFan?

 

Beat me to it. President Trump and his proxy here, YankeeFan, were hoping we either din't notice or forgot.

 

Trump is pissed that he's this deep into his presidency but hasn't gotten to bomb the bejeezus out of foreigners yet.

 

Ask that crowd about tar babies, YF.

 

I don't think this has been mentioned but I have to say this looks pretty good. Hope Never Dies. An Obama/Biden Mystery...

books.google.com/books/about/Hope_Never_Dies.html?id=3eA0DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button


Not sure why my link is fucked.

 

Analysis | The #WalkAway meme is what happens when everything is viral and nothing matters

#justwalkaway

 

I gotcher Kumbaya, swingin'.

 

It's the Russians. YF can explain.

 

Ever since Trump took office -- and immediately began violating the Constitution by profiting off his businesses without placing them in blind trusts -- we've heard that Treason, by definition, can only be committed against a country with which we are at war. Well, maybe not. Norman Ornstein, not exactly a libruhl thinker, cited Article 3, Section 3, which reads:
Article 3 - The Judicial Branch
Section 3 - Treason
<<Back | Table of Contents | Next>>

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

A little confusing, don't you think? If it's only for war, why throw in the clause beginning with "or"? To me, it leaves open this question: Can you commit treason by adhering to the enemies of the United States and giving aid and comfort to them in nominal peacetime?


Geez.