1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Why would Pence, the Senate President, swear in a House member?
     
  2. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    A busty intern in a tight dress, no less.
    Must be tough to find one of them around the White House, eh?
     
    HanSenSE and BitterYoungMatador2 like this.
  3. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    But the House doesn't offer proportional representation.

    California has 69 times the population of Wyoming . . . and 53 times the representation.

    The math makes it impossible. You can't go lower than 1 or higher than 438.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
    Donny in his element likes this.
  4. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Then introduce legislation or a Constitutional amendment (I'm not sure exactly which would be required) to expand the House. It's been at 435 since 1913.
    The reason we have the House and the Senate and they're set up the way they are is because there was a concern about the large states dominating the small ones. It's one of many checks and balances, and it's still one that appears to be needed.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
  5. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    I think there might be one or two more of those to come.

    Also, that means the Democrats have a chance to get to at least 230 if they hold the seven races they are leading that haven't been called.
     
  6. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Why we are where we are

     
  7. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    It's stuck because we permanently stuck it.

    The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
     
  8. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    A little Google-Fu says that "permanent" actually means "it can be changed by a simple majority of both houses of Congress."
    So it could be done without amending the Constitution or requiring a super majority.
    Maybe in a few years when the Democrats are running everything and Gavin Newsom is president they'll get around to it. Probably just make all 475 or whatever it would be now from California, just to be safe. Even if people don't live there, that's where everybody wants to live.
     
  9. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

  10. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Senate apportionment has been kicked around since the Alien and Sedition acts, Batman. The two-senator allotment was ignorant of demographic shifts in the late 19th century, never mind our own.
     
  11. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    That's not fair. You told me just last week that you want to live in Biloxi or Slidell.
     
    Batman likes this.
  12. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    And yet it, and our country, has managed to survive and thrive with it the way it is for 230 years. So why is this suddenly some major injustice?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page