1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Radio, newspaper, and my ethics

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by CanzanoJohn, Aug 21, 2007.

  1. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    And Canzano couldn't score even 4 points a game in the NBA... but he still comments on it, doesn't he?
     
  2. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    That makes me feel greasy, too. As does/did the Cubs/Tribune arrangement. Difference is, if you work at the Globe or Tribune and cover baseball, you don't have a choice but to "take money from the team."

    JC has a choice. He doesn't have to take it.
     
  3. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    Obviously, you haven't seen his killer crossover.
     
  4. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I'd kinda like to see Mr. Cowbell take a charge, though.
     
  5. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Sure they do. They can choose not to work there.
     
  6. Jesus Quintana

    Jesus Quintana New Member

    I need to set the record straight.
    A few days ago, I posted about John's lack of ethics regarding one of his previous stops. The only one lacking ethics in the situation was me.
    I publicly repeated a rumor that I believed to be true at the time. After receiving a couple of e-mails from John -- both of which were more than professional -- I now know those rumors are completely untrue.
    I've apologized to John privately, but I hope putting the truth out there publicly helps erase any doubt about John's professionalism. For whatever damage I've done to John's reputation, I am truly sorry.
    The mistake I made was senseless and irresponsible. As a journalist, I should have known better.
     
  7. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Technically, it would be libel and I'm not sure if you can sue Jesus.
     
  8. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    This will be the only part of this entire topic on which MG and I agree.
     
  9. broadway joe

    broadway joe Guest

    This, from the guy who thinks we're too quick to attack our own.
     
  10. JackS

    JackS Member

    You could be the hardest working, most ethical person in the world, and if you were in sports, you'd still be in the toy department.

    The lack of importance is what makes sports the toy department. Nothing else.
     
  11. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Except the "toy department" does not lack in importance. Not when team owners are holding city taxpayers hostage in order to get free stadiums (see currently the Seattle SuperSonics); not when cable television companies are fighting with upstart TV stations over how much to charge viewers a fight that could cause everyone's cable rates to go up no matter whether they watch or not (see the Big Ten network); not when the Michael Vick case is front page news everywhere; not when SI.com has within the last 10 minutes posted a story by Frank Deford about the absurdly high mortality rate of pro wrestlers; now when China is hosting the Olympics while intimidating their athletes into toeing the government line.

    Actually, if the sports department is the toy department, it most assuredly is because of "something else" besides "the lack of importance."
     
  12. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    All of which would seem to me an argument toward higher ethical standards rather than lower.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page