1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Realistically, what's the highest USF can finish?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Mizzougrad96, Oct 7, 2007.

  1. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    If a BCS conference champion goes undefeated, it can't be any worse than third in the country by definition. There won't be more than three undefeated teams from BCS conferences. If South Florida is undefeated alone and doesn't go to the final game, let's not forget the Big East is the most litigious conference in college sports.
     
  2. Piotr Rasputin

    Piotr Rasputin New Member

    I'm sure it's already been said, but:

    The way the system is set up, if USF is one of only two unbeatens (or the only one), it should play for the national title as an undefeated team from one of the six BCS conferences.

    No debate, no bellyaching. An undefeated season by any BCS school is enough for consideration, and if there are two or fewer unbeatens, the BCS would once again show how flawed it is if such a team were kept out.
     
  3. linotype

    linotype Well-Known Member

    Except that its apologists would claim that the system worked -- in the loosest sense of the word. If, say, unbeaten LSU were matched up in the final BCS standings with one-loss Southern Cal or a two-loss team, "It worked!" they'd shriek. "It gave us two teams to play in the title game without bias." That's how they justified taking FSU over Miami in 2000, or taking LSU and Oklahoma over SC in '03, or SC-Oklahoma and not Auburn in '05, etc.

    Well, duh. By that standard it's always going to "work" because it's always going to spit out two teams. Whether it's LSU vs. South Florida, Ohio State vs. South Carolina, UConn vs. UAB -- as long as it produces a matchup of two teams, any teams, the apologists can claim it "worked."

    Only way it doesn't is if the BCS computers determine that the title game should match LSU against a box of dildos.
     
  4. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Wow. I didn't realize he was an SEC snob.
     
  5. linotype

    linotype Well-Known Member

    So where, Mr. Carville, does this leave defending national champ Florida?
     
  6. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    LSU fan.
     
  7. Hammer Pants

    Hammer Pants Active Member

    I don't know. The South Carolina-Georgia border on I-85 between Atlanta and Greenville has that 5-mile stretch of nothing but those red and yellow signs that all-but tell you this place gives you a happy ending.
     
  8. nafselon

    nafselon Well-Known Member

    Shhh....that kills the logic.

    Besides anyone who really followed the SEC knows that Mississippi State isn't the worst team in the conference. Right state, wrong team.
     
  9. Johnny Dangerously

    Johnny Dangerously Well-Known Member

    And LSU graduate.
     
  10. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Well. THAT raises the bar.
     
  11. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    South Florida won't be in the Gator Bowl with one loss. Forget it. Their fans wouldn't stay 2-3 nights in hotels and spend money in the city, which is big with the Gator Bowl people. Plus, the Gator Bowl has to go Big 12 in two of the next three years (per their current contract) and wants to match Texas (with at least a 8-4 record) against Clemson, Virginia Tech or FSU (whoever doesn't get to the ACC title game).
     
  12. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    He's an idiot on so many levels that it's hard to know where to start.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page