RIP Antonin Scalia

There is research arguing Clinton still would have won in 1992 without Perot.

 

It won't, which shows how stupid the Republican argument was.

Did they really think Obama would just say, "Yeah, great idea Republicans! I'll forfeit my Constitutional duty that was given to me by the voters in 2012 and just let the next guy or woman handle it because you think I should!"

 

McCain gets very "unMavericky" when he's running for re-election. And he has a battle on his hands in the primary from a Donald Sterling defender who also supports Clive Bundy and believes in chemtrails.

 

After losing in 92, where does Clinton get all this popularity to win big in '96?

 

Fraudulent voters.

 

I sure hope we address chemtrails next. That stuff is killing us.

 

It was the economy, stupid.

 

" ... research arguing ... "

That's not exactly convincing.

 

Secretary of State Alex Jones will fix it once President Trump is in the White House.

 

Consider the source.

 

The two leading board dummies wouldn't know peer-reviewed research if it bit them on the ass. Doubt they could understand an abstract.

Here's a tip: Use Google Scholar

http://courses.washington.edu/pbafadv/student presentations/Multinomial_1992 Election.pdf

The Vote-Stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. Presidential Election on JSTOR

 

Great. Since you now know how to use Google, why don't you find those five Republican initiatives.

But what do I expect from someone who thinks people should work a $30K a year job instead of a $45K a year job?