RIP Roger Ebert

Without Ebert, there would be no Ronnie "Z-Man" Barzell...

RIP

 

But did he think Brad Renfro was good in it?

 

It sounds trite, but in his writings, you could tell that he loved life. He loved the high minded stuff, but on their merits and if a fart joke made him laugh, he said so.

I loved reading his reviews and also respected his opinions. And when faced with his medical struggles, he hit them head on and simply kept on working.

I've linked it here before, but my favorite of his negative reviews.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20011005/REVIEWS/110050304/1023

 

8 Things About Ebert:

http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/roger-ebert-eight-things-might-not-known-225253026.html

 

When I was a kid, before the Interwebs and because my local paper didn't run a lot of Hollywood news in the features section, Siskel & Ebert were the place to learn about new movies. They gave you an honest opinion, but showed enough clips to let you decide whether to see it. I went crazy in the summer of 1989 with all the genre movies that came out: "Ghostbusters 2," "Batman," "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade," to name a few. Siskel & Ebert had all the clips. It was awesome.

 

Damn right. If he'd never written a movie review, revolutionized televised criticism, showed bravery and humility in the face of adversity or proven through his writing that his conscience was as well-honed as anyone's, he'd still be able to take that wonderful, bizarre script to his grave and be proud.

RIP to a legend.

 

His recent review of Movie 43 was pretty hilarious as well:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130123/REVIEWS/130129973/1023

 

Ebert had a kind of egalitarian, sly style of writing and criticism that was Internet style decades before the Internet hit big. But his talent exceeded about 99.99999 percent of the people who will ever write for the Net. His review of a movie would often be the deciding factor as to whether I would go. I think he had a weak spot for Woody Allen, but other than that, the standard against which all critics should be judged. R.I.P.

 

One of the few times that The Onion reads like more than just satire: http://www.theonion.com/articles/roger-ebert-hails-human-existence-as-a-triumph,31945/.

 

He was really the first movie critic with a national following and the first to be accessible to a wide variety of people. He knew as much as anyone about movies, but he never lost sight of the fact that his role was to tell people whether a movie was worth the price of admission and the time.

 

http://www.sporcle.com/games/covertman/roger_ebert