1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Rob Parker controversy

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Pulitzer Wannabe, Dec 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Oh, the "we get picked on too" defense.

    Uh-uh.
     
  2. Angola!

    Angola! Guest

    hey frederick, know what i heard? parker not only lies for the suits he also attends the dreaded 10 a.m. meetings.
     
  3. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    I have no idea what you mean by the phrase. If I come on and post something, it's usually pretty accurate. Obviously I will not break the confidence of a friend but there will be some action involving Rob and he will not be fired.
    And I agree with Frederick, Rob manned up. He apologized. Time to let it die.
     
  4. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    . . . until the next time he attempts to commit career suicide with his mouth.
     
  5. T2

    T2 Member

    Why, did you think some political point was being implied? I read it as an indication that the coach knew how to take care of himself if it came down to a physical confrontation -- the same as if he had been described as a former nightclub bouncer or a one-time Golden Gloves champion or an ex-policeman.

    Also, doesn't the coach sound like a politician doggedly sticking to his talking points? Repeatedly asked whether his son-in-law should be fired, he answered a different question by saying that he himself was present at all the meetings. All I can take from that is that the head coach is calling all the shots and therefore it doesn't matter whether the coordinator is his son-in-law or some guy off the street.
     
  6. markvid

    markvid Guest

    Honestly, T2, I'd have been confused with any of the examples you listed in your post. To me, makes no sense to the current situation.
    Didn't think it was a political point, just pointless.
     
  7. T2

    T2 Member

    The writer may have brought up the tough-guy reference because he personally thought Marinelli should have punched Parker out. The sentence before the Vietnam reference: "Parker is lucky Marinelli didn't come off the podium and give him the business."
     
  8. Fredrick

    Fredrick Well-Known Member

    It's a decent defense. Sources shit on reporters all the time. Reporters forgive the sources and move on to do their job. This coach was recipient of a bad joke. The coach expressed his feelings; the writer apologized because the joke was inappropriate and we move on. You think the guy should get fired for this or disciplined? I don't. People could write books about the stupid things thrown out there at news conferences during a long season. He apologized. Story is overblown.
     
  9. TwoGloves

    TwoGloves Well-Known Member

    Don't forget, this is the same guy whose sources told him a while back that an MSU player was involved in a brawl. He went on TV and basically threw the kid under the proverbial bus when it wasn't true at all.
     
  10. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Buh... buh... buh ... his friends will stick by him.
     
  11. TwoGloves

    TwoGloves Well-Known Member

    By the way, sources who "shit" on me wouldn't be forgiven. That said, I can remember ever being foolish enough to use a source who would "shit" on me. Maybe that's why I don't have a column in the Detroit News.
     
  12. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Unless it's not. Hey, kinda like a Rob Parker thought process!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page