1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Roethlisberger in motorcycle accident?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by BYH, Jun 12, 2006.

  1. Gold

    Gold Active Member

    In California, when the law was changed to require helmets, the number of fatalities were reduced almost by half.

    Wearing a helmet may be legal in Pennsylvania, but every manufacturer of motorcycles recommends you wear a helmet. That should tell you something.

    And another thing. The other person involved in the accident may not have seen him. Motorcycles are a lot harder to see when you are driving.
     
  2. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    If she did indeed drive through a red light, then yes, she's at fault for the accident. But does that make her solely responsible for the extent of Roethlisberger's injuries, especially if a helmet would have prevented most (if not all) of the head injuries?
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    From experience, I can tell you the "I didn't see him" excuse doesn't fly very far in court.
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    This is all hindsight is 20/20 stuff. He was unwise for jeopardizing his career in the first place by riding a bike. Stubbornly riding it without a helmet was reckless and stupid. But fault doesn't really matter much, now. It is what it is.
     
  5. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Motorcycles are often overlooked because people don't think to watch for them. Doesn't make you any less at fault if you cause an accident because you don't see a bike, however.

    Everyone needs to be more careful in general. Those of us with cars need to watch for bikes and those on bikes need to watch for cars and wear their helmets (not that it applies in this case, but those on bikes should also not drive 130mph down city streets either).
     
  6. Flash

    Flash Guest

    The chick who hit my boyfriend and me on his motorcycle when I was 18 lost her driver's licence for 10 years. But she didn't see us because she was hammered.
     
  7. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    Anyone who has a DUI should permanently lose their license.

    SEE: Little, Leonard.
     
  8. Gold

    Gold Active Member

    so you have seen my brother ;)
     
  9. Terd Ferguson

    Terd Ferguson Member

    You ride a bike, you should know you are less visible and take extra precautions. Wearing a helmet is a step in that direction. I have no sympathy for people who ride without helmets. I've seen first hand what can happen without one (was out riding with a friend who wrecked without one)  and I've never gotten on a motorcycle, scooter, moped, etc. since even with a helmet. It sounds crappy, but you deserve what you get if you wreck without a helmet.

    As for the extent of his injuries: Even with a helmet Ben could have injured his body to an extent that football wouldn't be possible as a future career choice. True, but wearing a helmet would help prevent Ben from having no career choices. Even with bum knees a guy can get a job. A guy who comes out a vegetable or with serious brain damage: Not quite as employable.
     
  10. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    I was dating your brother? I had no idea! ;)
     
  11. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    did your air bags deploy?
     
  12. Dude

    Dude Well-Known Member

    Sunlight shouldn't have been a problem. Where the accident occured, you are literally under the Parkway East.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page