1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Romney a Lock - You Can Put it On the Board YESSSS!!

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Evil Bastard (aka Chris_L), Mar 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. I'll agree with Michael but I'd suggest Romney hire a bunch of loudmouths to go into bars in swing states being obnoxious about supporting Obama. I'd ask them to be especially loud about their support for "The One" during sporting events while people are trying to listen to the play-by-play. If asked why they are supporting Obama - I'd have them reply because Obama is awesome and because I'm a Democrat and that anyone who votes against Obama is a racist.

    And I'd have the loudmouth drunks drink Amstel Light (which almost by definition means they would also be lousy tippers).

    That should sew it up for Romney.
     
  2. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Let's just let the swing states vote and everyone else sit it out.
     
  3. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    I can't make a decision without pertinent rap lyrics. Can someone help out?
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    He actually inherited a $1.413 trillion deficit in 2009 -- budget passed under Bush (The 2009 fiscal year began October 1, 2008, nearly four months before Obama took office.)

    The problem is that debt has really taken off the last couple of years. $1.293 trillion deficit in 2010. $1.3 trillion deficit in 2011. $1.327 trillion deficit for 2012.

    Our national debt rose $4.9 trillion during Bush's two terms. That was a near doubling of the national debt -- we put ourselves on a dangerous and unsustainable path.

    But since then, our national debt has gone from $10.6 trillion on Bush's last day in office to $15.7 trillion and counting -- in a little more than three years. Any narrative other than that is a lie.

    It's actually more of a function of Congress, than the president. The president sends BS budget requests to Capital Hill that have no chance of getting passed -- he can claim that he tried to raise taxes or propose spending cuts over the next decade, knowing it isn't going to happen. The House and Senate come up with their resolutions that they reconcile, and voila $1 trillion deficits every year since 2009.
     
  5. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Do you want something current, or from the late 90's?

    Depending on the answer, I can suggest a member or two who can post some lyrics.
     
  6. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Apparently, Romney believes Obama should be tried for treason.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-stands-silent-as-supporter-charges-obama-with-treason-20120507,0,1043856.story

    (Moderators, feel free to move this over to the political coward thread!)
     
  7. Greenhorn

    Greenhorn Active Member

    Well, President Obama is a member of the Democrat Party, which is all the evidence for some wingnuts.......
     
  8. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member


    . . . without revenue increases, lots of luck . . .

    The Ryan/GOP jokebook . . . the gift which keeps on taking, and taking, and taking.
     
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    If we are going to spend $3.8 trillion worth, yup, without revenue increases, it ain't gonna happen.

    Of course, a pretty good question is why does our Federal government need to spend $3.8 trillion -- and growing at a steep pace?

    As recently as 2001, Federal spending was less than half of that.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Here comes the money from the Left:

     
  11. JRoyal

    JRoyal Well-Known Member

    Most of the increase, though, came under a GOP administration. Federal spending in Bush's last budget was something like $3.5 trillion. Making massive cuts in the middle of a recession could have triggered a major depression.

    I think the debate is there to be had, but if the debate becomes the GOP wants to cut vs. all of the increase goes on Obama, then it starts from a disingenuous place. If the debate is that the GOP and the Democrats in Washington have put us in a horrible situation through cowardly decisions from both sides that were geared more toward pandering to voters and less toward what would be best for the country, and now we have to bite the bullet and decide how we want to get out of it, then it is a much more honest debate.
     
  12. JRoyal

    JRoyal Well-Known Member

    It was just a matter of time. Both sides have these big-money donors who drop tons into different groups. I hate what super PACs have done to the electoral process, mainly because of the ridiculous loopholes in the laws. Everyone know they're a joke. Heck, Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart showed how much earlier this year. It'll be interesting to see if the Democrats' strategy of feeding the grass roots works better than funding the super PACs and paying for ad buys.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page