1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running 2011 Bowl Season Thread- Match-ups on Page 1

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Armchair_QB, Dec 4, 2011.

  1. derwood

    derwood Active Member

    Iowa State and Rutgers at Yankee Stadium. SJ outing?
     
  2. NickMordo

    NickMordo Active Member

    Same old Sparty which kicked Michigan's ass. So I guess teams should try to play for third place in conferences which have championship games because they will jump up in the rankings just by sitting on their couches.
     
  3. ucacm

    ucacm Active Member

    Why do people think the bowl system is based on merit? There is only one game, the BCS championship game, which is supposedly based on merit. The rest is pretty much the prerogative of bowl organizers. Why is that so hard to understand?

    I suppose the bowls that are guaranteed to have conference champions are at least partially based on merit, too.
     
  4. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    If people can't get up for 6-7 UCLA against 6-6 Illinois in San Francisco, I just don't know what the world's coming to.
     
  5. DocTalk

    DocTalk Active Member

    I realize that January 1 falls on a Sunday, home to the church of pro football, but how sad there will be no bowl game played on New Year's Day.
     
  6. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Fine, ucacm, I'll concede your point, but that matters little, because I think it shouldn't be that way. Slot the whole shebang!
     
  7. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Actually kind of the norm. The Rose Bowl has a many-decades tradition of not playing on Jan. 1 when it falls on a Sunday. The theory being, you don't play the game (or hold the parade) on a Sunday, and God won't rain on the parade or the game.
     
  8. ucacm

    ucacm Active Member

    If you went to a hard bowl slotting system based on the order of conference standings, I think the result would be a lot less bowl games. People wouldn't be bitching about getting passed over for X bowl, they'd be bitching about not going to a bowl at all. Now, some may argue there are too many bowl games, but that is another debate.
     
  9. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    I just find it hilarious that all the Boise fanbois around here are bitching about how their beloved Broncos got screwed by the very system they've benefited from in the past.
     
  10. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I'll bite: why would there be fewer bowls?
     
  11. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    Think someone will actually score one of those new-fangled things called a touchdown this time? Think Alabama's kickers will take off the square toe and actually make something past 30 yards?

    Wow, I'm not Boise State fan but you don't "benefit" from the system if you were an automatic qualifier for a BCS game because of your BCS ranking. You'd earned it, it's not some entitlement present like Michigan and Va Tech got tonight.

    And at least Boise State wins when it plays a BCS bowl, and doesn't just show up, mail it in and steal the money, as Alabama did against Utah. Or at least, that's what we're told, since Bama fans trying to rationalize that out-and-out total ass-kicking said they just didn't care.
     
  12. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Without the BCS Boise does not make two Fiesta Bowl appearances. That's called benefitting from the system.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page