1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running 2011 Bowl Season Thread- Match-ups on Page 1

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Armchair_QB, Dec 4, 2011.

  1. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Always lots of entertaining reading on this annual SportsJournalists.com thread.

    Personally, if I could watch only one bowl game on the tube, I think the most entertaining would be Arkansas St. versus Northern Illinois. And I'm not kidding about that. A great matchup between two of the best have-nots teams in Division I football.

    Well, I suppose the University of Iowa alumni in me would like to see the Hawkeyes try to stop Oklahoma somehow in Tempe. Unfortunately I'm working that night, though.
     
  2. gravehunter

    gravehunter Member

    I think that the proof of a corrupt system comes in allowing Ohio State to play in a bowl game. They shouldn't have played in one last year, and the only reason they get to play in one this year is because the NCAA is dragging its feet.
     
  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Both interim coaches will be hungry for the permanent job ...
     
  4. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    Sorry but that's going to be one of the better games. Logan Thomas vs. Denard Robinson? Are you kidding? Those two guys will combine for 600 yards total offense.
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I left my coach...in San Francisco.
     
  6. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    Excuse me, but once you get past No. 1 vs. No. 2, the whole idea is to get matchups to fill seats. The non-BCS bowls such as the Gator are doing exactly what they're supposed to do: bring business to town. Right now, the NCAA allows 6-6 teams to go to bowls. You got a beef, call them.
     
  7. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    They bring a shitload of fans to bowl games. That's why. Money talks, bullshit (and lousy bowl teams) walks.
     
  8. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    uhhhh ... that happens every time New Year's Day falls on a Sunday. Where you been?
     
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I read some of the fall out from the Fiesta Bowl mess. I didn't realize what a crock the payouts really are. I'm sure the rest of the bowls operate similarly.
    A team's "payout" is the total allotment of tickets sold - total expenses for those traveling on the school's dime. Which - outside of the BCS - tends to not be that much.
    Oh? You didn't sell all your tickets? We'll charge you for the balance and deduct that from your payout as well.
    This might be one of those years where fans may not be willing to fly to some of these games. New Orleans will probably make more money off of the Sugar Bowl than they will the NCG.

    The bowl games are the equivalent of the pre-regular season basketball tournaments. Some might be good and have some impact, but most are just extra games.
     
  10. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Purdue made a fucking bowl? Purdue vs. Western Michigan in Detroit -- the magic of the bowl system.

    I refuse to invest any emotion in the BCS or the bowls anymore. It's a stupid system that isn't worth my time, energy or viewing time.

    I will follow college football fanatically when it gets a playoff system (16 team-system), but the current way of doing things is a joke and I won't pay one iota of attention to it. I really don't even care that Wisconsin is in the Rose Bowl, only that it won the Big Ten championship.

    College football ... the ultimate anticlimax.
     
  11. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    The people who defend the current system always say "it's a business." I agree. So tax it. All of it. Make the giving of athletic scholarships grounds for losing tax-exempt status for a school while you're at it.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    You can do like I do and just consider it an extension of the regular season. There are a few compelling match ups in bowl games; teams it's just interesting to see matched up after the seasons they had. I will just ignore the dog shit games and watch the games where the match ups are interesting or might make for even games, and not consider the bowl games as meaning much more than "just another game."

    I agree Virginia Tech doesn't deserve a BCS birth after crapping out against Clemson again, but the person who said that VT would have been 6-6 in the Pac 12 is ridiculous.

    Also, one small positive about VT jumping to the Sugar Bowl is that it put Virginia up a bowl into the Peach Bowl against Auburn. That is an interesting game. It was good to see the Peach Bowl take them over Florida State and Georgia Tech with the simple rationale (other than their fans might be starved for a bowl game after the last few years) that Virginia beat both teams this year.

    The sad part, of course, is that Virginia Tech lost its conference championship game and somehow that put them into a better bowl game with a more sexy match up against Michigan, rather than West Virginia. It makes no sense.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page