1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running 2018 college rings postseason thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Cosmo, Mar 1, 2018.

  1. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member

     
  2. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    That's a screenshot from yesterday afternoon. Add more red!
     
  3. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I'd be more than okay if Gonzaga or Nevada wins it all, I'll be disgusted if a Duke, Syracuse, Villanova, Kansas or Kentucky wins it all, particularly in a year like this. My secret wish is that Texas A&M wins, just to put MORE pressure on Jimbo Fisher.
     
  4. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Now that Haas is out -- not to mention Virginia, Michigan State, UNC, etc. -- I am confident in predicting a Villanova championship.
     
  5. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't mind Villanova winning it all. The sport could use another blueblood, especially a city school without a big-time football program. (Insert joke about Kansas here.)
     
  6. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Time for some crowdsourcing of people who have watched more basketball than I have this year.

    I'm still alive in a one-and-done pool, along with 40 other souls. Gotta pick one team per day the rest of the way. Of the Sweet 16, I have burned KY, K-State, Purdue and Duke. Strongly believe I have to keep Villanova, Kansas and Gonzaga in my pocket until the round of 8 or later, with so many other players left.

    So for Thursday, my choices are essentially Loyola, Nevada, Michigan, Texas A&M. I'm leaning Nevada.
    For Friday, I think I'm going to have to ride Texas Tech. Again, holding onto Nova and Kansas, and picking Cuse over Duke sounds like a big reach (of course, so was Cuse over MSU ...).
     
  7. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Late in the UMBC game last night, UMBC was down by five, with maybe a minute left. UMBC player is open from, say 22 feet, shoots and misses, and Raftery chimes in with something to the effect of "that was a reach at that spot".
    Announcers love to second guess three point shots, or shots early in the clock. Not sure what better shot UMBC was going to get from then on out.

    20-20 hindsight.
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Syracuse made it to the Final 4 as a 10-seed. Duke is basically a senior and 4 freshmen.

    I'd take Syracuse. Boeheim is coaching them well right now.
     
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    It always amazes me how "crazy" the first round is, and by the Elite Eight it looks like repeat. I'd go with Nevada. Musselman has been through it all, I don't think he will allow his team to get distracted by the attention this week, which is usually what undoes the magic of the surprise teams. They go back to campus and suddenly everyone wants to talk to them and get out of their routine.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Not to mention that there are usually reasons that they lost a bunch of games all year long, or that their players weren't recruited by the schools they are playing against now.
     
  11. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    True, true. And I burned Duke in the second round because I thought Sparty would pick them off on Friday. But Cuse definitely has the hot hand. No one else has won three games in this tournament!
     
  12. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Right. It's one thing to pull off a huge win over a more talented team. It's a lot harder to do it again and again.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page