1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running bowl thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Mystery Meat II, Dec 3, 2009.

  1. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Considering Florida and Bama played crappy teams in November, I don't know how much more absurd it would be for the top ranked teams to face MAC and Sun Belt teams in the first round - throw in one at-large bid though and give the top four seeds first round byes - it could work.
     
  2. deskslave

    deskslave Active Member

    Non-conference games. What they can control, in other words.

    I'm aware Boise beat Oklahoma. Believe me, I'm aware.
     
  3. highlander

    highlander Member

    In TCU's case that wouldn't happen. Have you watched TCU play at all this season?
     
  4. highlander

    highlander Member

    Cincinnati was available for the Fiesta Bowl. They passed on the Bearcats and took Boise State. Gewt your facts straight.
     
  5. highlander

    highlander Member

    I think by matching TCU and Boise State the BCS got what they wanted. One non-BCS team knocking off the other. That eliminates to possibility of TCU and BSU finishing second and third in the final polls.
     
  6. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Actually, they couldn't have. Oklahoma State had three losses and Nebraska had four. By BCS rules, no team with more than two can be considered for an at-large spot.
     
  7. Mystery Meat II

    Mystery Meat II Well-Known Member

    But even if we assume that's what the BCS wants, why would the Fiesta Bowl sign off? If TCU-Boise State is a less-interesting game with lower ratings and a lesser chance of a sellout than TCU-Cincinnati, why would they work against their own interests by taking a pass on the Bearcats (ha, I almost typed Bengals)?

    Another thing: If Boise State went to the Sugar to play Florida, wouldn't that mean Boise was the last choice? Wouldn't a lot of you be pissed because the Sugar only took Boise because nobody else wanted them, showing them disrespect?
     
  8. highlander

    highlander Member

    Yes TCU's offense isn't very good. It's only the No. 4 offense in the nation.
     
  9. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Only their first-string, which would be worn out by midway through the second half playing a major-conference team. They'd have to rely on their fifth string by the third quarter.
     
  10. doggieseatdoggies

    doggieseatdoggies New Member

    My point is Junker lied when he said they wanted to pick the best ranked teams. He clearly didn't when faced with Cincy or Boise. All he had to do was say Boise draws better in this region. He either lied or had no idea what the BCS rankings final outcome was.
     
  11. Captain_Kirk

    Captain_Kirk Well-Known Member

    Well, since Boise hadn't been ahead of Cincinnati in the BCS rankings in oh, about all year, I'll take the former of your two options.
     
  12. Mystery Meat II

    Mystery Meat II Well-Known Member

    If that was your point, yeah, that's fair. But then you said the BCS effectively rigged it so that the Big East could keep their auto-bid. To believe this is to believe that the Fiesta Bowl sandbagged itself for the cause. And if Florida routs Cincinnati, people might make that case anyway.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page