1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running CFB playoff thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Neutral Corner, Nov 7, 2024.

  1. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    They really don’t. No one is getting a competitive leg up by increasing the take from a playoff.
     
  2. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    It would be so funny if he wins the natty and they fire him anyway.
     
  3. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    It would cost them $37,000,000. I agree it would be a remarkable statement of what they really value. But I don't think anybody's going to pull the trigger on that degree of a buyout before they have a handle on the true cost of fielding a championship team in the institutional compensation era.
     
  4. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    they know the cost — they spent 20 mil this season
     
  5. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    That's without direct institutional payments. Going forward, there will still be no limit on what the collectives can provide. But on top of that, schools will have ~ $22 million each to dole out across their sports. The trick will be knowing how much to devote to Lord God Football.
     
  6. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

    Please, do not call a low seed playing a high seed a “Cinderella.” That’s for basketball.

    Call them a Rudy if you must.

    And if you don’t like Rudy, come up with something better. I’m sure there is. I just couldn’t think of it.
     
  7. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Good lord, they shot about a year's production budget with this one.

     
    Batman likes this.
  8. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    It makes me laugh hearing the SEC teams talking about "scheduling down" now. They only play eight conference games, maybe each team plays one legit P4 school in non-con. They can't get much softer in the non-con. Now maybe Sankey evens out the schedule So your bellcows only play 2 or 3 others a season - what the SEC really needs to do is bring in some more middling or worse teams.
     
    HappyCurmudgeon likes this.
  9. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Chiming in late since I've been off the grid most of the weekend, but I think they absolutely got this right. If you're putting 11-1 SMU that went unbeaten in conference play up against 9-3 Alabama that lost two very questionable road games in conference play, SMU is the choice, 100 percent. SMU wasn't -- and shouldn't have been -- punished for playing in its conference championship game. If Ole Miss doesn't lose to Kentucky, it's probably in. If Alabama doesn't lose to Oklahoma, it's probably in. But those games happened and can't be ignored. I could have completely bought both schools' arguments against 11-1 SMU or 11-1 Indiana, but not with three losses.
     
    Batman, SixToe, I Should Coco and 2 others like this.
  10. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    The Penn State gag is understated brilliance.
     
  11. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    “Bama needs Finebaum air support” might be their best line of the season.
     
  12. HappyCurmudgeon

    HappyCurmudgeon Well-Known Member

    Alabama played Wisconsin, USF, Mercer and Western Kentucky....I'm sure that took a LOT out of them.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page