1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running College Hockey Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by longjumper42, Nov 13, 2006.

  1. Gutter

    Gutter Well-Known Member

    There was no way it couldn't have been a goal from that angle ... no way it could hit off the side of the net. If anything, I think the fans' reaction behind the net helped the referees in their decision (if they saw that view).
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It was a goal. They did well to take that much time and make 100 percent sure, but they got it right. AF knows it, too.
     
  3. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    BTW, I've seen this scenario play out before, at the WCHA final five in St. Paul years ago in a St. Cloud-Minnesota game.

    Two St. Cloud players cross on a 2X2, drop pass, one timer ripped, went through the net. Pretty sure it was Tyler Arnason that shot it.

    Play went on for a few minutes. Next stoppage, they look at the tape, award St. Cloud State the goal.

    My only question then -- and it wouldn't have applied here -- is why they didn't reset the clock to where it was when the goal was scored.
     
  4. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    So why did they wait almost six minutes of atual game time before reviewing?
     
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It was the first stoppage of play.
     
  6. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    No shit... damn..
     
  7. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Begging the question: What if Air Force had scored in the interim?

    Madness.
     
  8. derwood

    derwood Active Member

    Why is this game in HD, others were in SD?
     
  9. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    The penalty killing was solid, but it was made easier by Duluth's mystifying unwillingness to go to the net and create scoring chances.

    The final score was 2-1. UMD waited too long to start playing with any real urgency. I would've thought, coming off the win over Princeton, the Bulldogs would've been flying. They failed to capitalize on a slew of golden power-play opportunities in the second period, including two 5-on-3 situations.
     
  10. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    It wasn't 6 minutes later. It was around the 6 minute mark. That announcing team was clueless.

    Had it on DVR because I knew I'd fall asleep. Just watched it, and when they said it happened with 10 minutes left and it was the first whistle since then. Did a rewind and there were at least two other stops in that six minute span.
     
  11. And why did it take the refs 15 minutes to review it? That was ridiculously long. I saw one replay and could see it was a goal. I understand them looking a few times at multiple angles to be absolutely certain, but, really, how else could the net have rippled like that if the puck hadn't gone through? From where it was shot, there was no way the puck hit the outside of the net.
     
  12. cougargirl

    cougargirl Active Member

    That's exactly why Notre Dame lost, too. Nobody wanted to crash the net, and in college hockey, so many goals are scored on chances within a stick's length of the goal.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page