1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running Hurricane Ike thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Simon_Cowbell, Sep 1, 2008.

  1. NoOneLikesUs

    NoOneLikesUs Active Member

    No shit. Even in the sense of what happened here in the Midwest. The local level reporting has been atrocious.
     
  2. Tommy_Dreamer

    Tommy_Dreamer Well-Known Member

    Serious quality funny right there.
     
  3. Italian_Stallion

    Italian_Stallion Active Member

    I agree.
     
  4. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    They always are, Katrina notwithstanding.
     
  5. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Same thing with Ivan. A bunch of little inland towns nobody ever heard of in South Alabama went without power and supplies for days on end, and no one in the outside world noticed because they were too busy filming wrecked condos at Gulf Shores. Those people were hatin' on FEMA a year before it became cool.
     
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    So why isn't it getting more coverage?

    Parts of the 5th-largest metro in the nation are still without power and might still be two weeks after the storm. If parts of DC (8th) or Boston (10th) had gone a week without power, I think it'd be a major story nationally.

    Is geography (aka East Coast bias) affecting the coverage?
     
  7. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Storms are sexy.

    Misery isn't.

    And regarding storm coverage . . . it's amazing how Time and Newsweek always blow them off (no pun intended). Except for Katrina, of course.

    If a bomb exploded in Southeast Texas and did the kind of damage Ike did . . . the coverage would be wall-to-wall.

    But nature's fury?

    We'll be there for the crashing waves and blowing trees . . . but stay and report in a hot, sticky, hellish part of the country with no electricity and no gasoline and no comfort? Screw that.
     
  8. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    The election probably has more to do with it. Can't cover more than one big story at a time you know.
     
  9. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Nah. Probably Gulf Coast bias. :)
     
  10. Italian_Stallion

    Italian_Stallion Active Member

    I'm with BTE. Nobody wants to cover misery.

    I also think the finance thing, combined with election coverage, pushed Ike's damage off the page.

    I wonder about that whole geographic bias. I don't discount that. I think that happens.
     
  11. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Funny thing is, this actually ties into part of the finance thing. The situation has curtailed oil production, which has got to be making people a little more jittery than they'd normally be.
    But the same thing happend when Allison hit in 2001. Half of Houston was underwater and it rated a 30-second brief on Headline News.
     
  12. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    One house, designed to withstand a Category 5 hurricane, escaped Ike on Galveston ...

    http://www.ireport.com/blogs/ireport-blog/2008/09/18/the-last-house-standing?updated
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page