1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running racism in America thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Scout, May 26, 2020.

  1. X-Hack

    X-Hack Well-Known Member

    That would be a hell of an accomplishment seeing as how Columbia Law doesn’t have a night program.
     
  2. X-Hack

    X-Hack Well-Known Member

    Sorry, but this is a longwinded way of advocating for “colorblind” policies that just bake in the advantages that white people have to a varying degree. Meritocracy without looking at context isn’t meritocracy.
     
  3. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    So it takes benevolent racism to fight malevolent racism?
     
  4. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    But, but, I was told that systemic racism was a myth perpetuated by the Radical Left.
     
    garrow and OscarMadison like this.
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    No, it's a long-winded way of saying exactly what it said.

    A meritocracy is a meritocracy. As in, people's qualifications and abilities are what determine their suitability for something. It means that you don't give preference to, or discriminate against, people based on their gender or race. Putting the word colorblind in quotation marks doesn't change the actual meaning of it, or the concept, to some distortion of it that you apparently want to attribute to me.

    The context you are talking about. ... is a history in which some people were shut out of things in the past because of their race or gender. The remedy for that isn't to do the same thing in reverse. ... shutting out different people based on broad categories now, and insisting on giving preference to others. At worst, that gives you vengeance, I guess. At best, it's a misguided attempt at a short cut that isn't the short cut people think it is at all. What it leaves you with is NOT a meritocracy, which is an unambiguous thing.

    Also, the idea that someone else posted, that giving preferences to people somehow creates a just place is kind of Orwellian to me. Justice means treating people equally and fairly, without discrimination or preference. Yet, we really have people twisting themselves into pretzels trying to turn unequal treatment of people into a just thing, where they conflate their rationalizations for why it is a good thing into it equaling the opposite of what it does.
     
  6. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    Nope. But here's the thing, when you come at life from a white man perspective, it leaves out a lot of other perspectives.
     
    wicked and OscarMadison like this.
  7. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    I just figured it out. He's Drax. Everything literally MUST be taken literally. No context, no subtext allowed.
     
    justgladtobehere likes this.
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    This racist garbage.

    To hell with ESPN for trashing Geno Smith as his teammates praise ‘phenomenal’ performance

    After Season 1, most media praise came from local writers who closely watched Geno’s games. Nationally, NFL media and GM’s were unimpressed. After 2013, ESPN conducted an anonymous poll of 26 NFL “League Insiders,” mostly GMs and coaches, to rank all 32 starting QBs.

    Where’s Geno? He’s No. 32. Dead last. ESPN quoted one coordinator comparing him to Akili Smith and JaMarcus Russell (two famous Black QB busts), and stated, “I think the way Geno Smith played last year was close to that.”

    Except he didn’t. Not even close to close. He wasn’t even in the same galaxy as Akili (career 3-14 record & 46.6 completion percentage). The only thing Geno shares with Akili is his last name and black skin. And ESPN promoted this racist garbage.
     
  9. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Must be the racism.

    But the racism is not about the Jets. They ruin their young white QBs too. The racism is the rest of NFL GMs and media who can still envision promise in Sam Darnold despite starting his third season at 0-9, but not in Geno who they see a future akin to Akili Smith’s instead of a future Drew Brees’ – Geno’s most identical early career comparison.

    How deep must racism be to refuse exploring a very simple question
     
  10. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    If your approach to your life is, "I have my perspective, and I am going to treat everything and anyone else like I am on an island," that is certainly true. I have no idea why that kind of close-mindedness would be the dominion of just white men. In my experience, people who are like that come from all walks of life.

    One place I really differ from you in, are the brushes you keep painting people with. People are a lot more than their skin color. Not all white people have the same experiences in life. Someone who grew up in poverty near the coal mines in West Virginia, is not a bird of a feather with a white man who grew up in Greenwich, Ct. Just as someone from a housing project in West Baltimore had a vastly different childhood, and has a different perspective, than a middle-class black person whose parents were college educated. We're all individuals, not cartoon caricatures.

    Regardless, it's just wrong to me to keep insisting on addressing past discriminatory practices with OTHER discriminatory practices or systems of preferences, and to argue that what you are doing is just. That's just backward. If you told me the aim is vengeance? Maybe. But then your goal isn't equal treatment of people. You are just doing more of the same, just picking others to discriminate against. An actual solution -- even though I am sure it won't seem like the feel-good quick fix you think you are offering -- is to stop putting everyone into those boxes and see people as individuals, not a skin color or a religion or a gender that you are going to reward or punish based on who you think is more deserving. Instead, start insisting that our government institutions themselves be places that treat everyone equally and fairly and in colorblind ways. That is how you can get closer to the just outcomes I think we both want. There aren't shortcuts.
     
  11. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Darnold is 3-1 without the Jets, who are 1-3 without him.
     
  12. Mr._Graybeard

    Mr._Graybeard Well-Known Member

    My father-in-law was a career fireman in a big-city fire department. When he died, all his old department buddies came out to the funeral. These were all guys in their 70s, but it still shocked me a bit when they started telling "colored" jokes and cheerfully flaunting their racism. One of their anecdotes was how they laughed a black guy out of the firehouse in the '60s when he came in to ask how to get on with the fire department.

    Some years later me wife and I hired a tradesman to install some vinyl flooring in our kitchen. Again, I was a little shocked when he spotted my public-radio T-shirt and started ranting about how he tried to get a job on the (same) fire department in the '70s but they hired a black guy instead.

    Who should feel more aggrieved, the guy who got mocked or the guy who got passed up?

    Frankly, your suggestion sounds feel-good to me because it's unrealistic in the world we live in. Just in our profession as an example, connections play a big role in pursuit of a quality job. What other reason is there to hang out with the bores at SPJ or the local press club? Have you ever seen a co-worker on the job because he was golfing buddies with the boss?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page