1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running Studio 60 thread (spoilers)

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Chi City 81, Sep 18, 2006.

  1. lantaur

    lantaur Well-Known Member

    When exactly is this show over (I mean the last air date)?
     
  2. Mighty_Wingman

    Mighty_Wingman Active Member

    I'm watching it now on my DVR...I just heard Danny Tripp trot out the ol' "You know who I am" around the 27-minute mark. Nice to see Sorkin's characters are still as smug and entitled as the man himself.

    And, once again, after however many episodes there've been, it's the same old show: Sorkin gets to win all the arguments because he gets to write both sides' lines. Nice work if you can get it, I guess.

    And Sorkin's ignorant potshots at the press show how much his ego has taken over since the early days of the West Wing, when he made Danny Concannon into a likeable, well-rounded character. Now, the press is a faceless, baying, hateful mob.

    Ugh.
     
  3. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Heh. I think the rat pack at the end of last night's show sets up things rather nicely.
     
  4. mediaguy

    mediaguy Well-Known Member

    I like that they saved Harriet's latest Holly Hunter impersonation for a 2001 flashback, though I'm pretty sure it was still dated even then.

    I really like this show, would certainly watch it if they kept it around. The politics are coming on a little thick lately, but this last show made me remember how amazingly shiny/happy/optimistic things were spun going into this war. Really like Mark McKinney's character -- really deep for a guy who gets three minutes of screen time a week. I will say the "Proof of Life" ransom arc with the network lawyer who has eight-figure mercenaries on speed dial is a bit much.
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    But you've got to remember - the network lawyers is fresh from a gig where she helped the Russians spy on the US in 24
     
  6. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    So, in order to get a job with Gage Whitney as an employment lawyer, you need to:

    1) Be an expert on ex-CIA types involved in recovering victims of kidnapping; and

    2) Be an expert on pre-natal complications.
     
  7. Killick

    Killick Well-Known Member

    Didn't seem so inconceivable to me. She's a corporate lawyer, makes sense she would be brought in to see if a company was breaking any laws in dealing with a Trask-like firm on paying ransom to foreign body. Also, a relative (her sister, I think she said?) had the same medical condition. Not a huge reach.
     
  8. Mighty_Wingman

    Mighty_Wingman Active Member

    But she's a corporate lawyer who was brought in to handle a sex-discrimination lawsuit, right? I'd think "K&R" would be a different division of the firm. Y'know, in a world where things made sense.
     
  9. Killick

    Killick Well-Known Member

    Yes, because lawyers never ever deal with more than one kind of case. C'mon, MW.
     
  10. Johnny Dangerously

    Johnny Dangerously Well-Known Member

    Well, lawyers at firms that large do tend to specialize, but they certainly would know who to call at a firm with such far-reaching real-world contacts. It's not like it would be a secret within the firm.

    That she'd talk about it outside the firm shows me she has a thing for Matt.


    (not like that's a secret)
     
  11. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    There's no point in suggesting posters go back and take a look at how carefully they're dissecting the reality of various scenes ... is there?

    I mean, anal-retentiveness comes to mind ...
     
  12. Johnny Dangerously

    Johnny Dangerously Well-Known Member

    Yeah! Amen!

    And, by the way, is anal-retentiveness supposed to be hyphenated?? ;)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page