1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running Studio 60 thread (spoilers)

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Chi City 81, Sep 18, 2006.

  1. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    My bad...

    I'm still looking for it on Mondays.
     
  2. Mighty_Wingman

    Mighty_Wingman Active Member

    Aren't we all.
     
  3. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    i watched it until i heard it wasn't coming back, then i stopped.
     
  4. I don't like Mondays.
     
  5. Killick

    Killick Well-Known Member

    Fen, just finished the Reagan diary, and noted the number of times he starts the week by writing "I don't like Mondays." Hmm. Is it an homage to the Boomtown Rats, or the "Hang in there" kitty poster Dutch had hanging on the back of the oval office door?
     
  6. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    That would depend on whether he wants to shoot the whole day down.
     
  7. Actually, it's an homage to the Tori Amos cover of the tune that Sorkin used at the end of Part Two of "24 Hours In America" on TWW.
    Nyah-nyah.
     
  8. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I remember reading in EW before the season started that S60 was going to be one of the most expensive shows ever (very rare for a new show) and said it would essentially have to be a Top 10 show to be profitable. They would have been better off hiring Perry and Whitford to anchor the show and hired cheaper actors to replace Busfield, Peet, Hughley and Weber...

    Corddry was one of the best supporting actors on the show and I guarantee you they got him for close to scale...

    If Sorkin didn't try to put together such an expensive cast, this show might have gotten a second season.
     
  9. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Hell, if he'd not put together such an expensive cast TWW might still be on the air.
     
  10. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    But shows are supposed to be expensive when they've been on the air for 5+ years. That's when they're in syndication and are the most profitable... That's why Ray Romano and Kelsey Grammar were both getting $1.8 mil per show during the final seasons of Raymond and Frasier... The reason ER has been on so long is that they've replaced expensive cast members with cheaper labor...

    I read somewhere that Perry makes $500K per show, Whitford makes $350K, Peet, Weber and Hughley make $200K and Busfield makes $150K per...

    I'll bet that on a show like "Ugly Betty" which people actually watched, nobody makes $100K per episode, or at least they didn't during the first season...
     
  11. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I agree, particularly on Peet and Hughley. Weber may be pricey, but he has been outstanding on the show. At this point, I'd rather lose Whitford, and I am a very big fan of his work.

    Isn't Busfield also an executive producer on the show?
     
  12. Mighty_Wingman

    Mighty_Wingman Active Member

    Didn't you guys hear? Anybody who questions Sorkin shouldn't post their opinions on this thread.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page