1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shocking Michael J. Fox Ad in MO Senate Race

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Deeper_Background, Oct 24, 2006.

  1. Scribe4264

    Scribe4264 Member

    Evidently, it was a set-up question for a religion slam after all.

    Nice try sweetie.
     
  2. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    For the record, Scribe has called dog "poochie" and JR "sweetie" in the last two posts. It's Ann Coulter, everyone!
     
  3. Scribe4264

    Scribe4264 Member

    Awww, are we jealous? Don't worry your pretty little head about it, sugar.
     
  4. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    You guys see that? Ann Coulter called me "sugar" and not "liberal!" Miracles do happen! :D
     
  5. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Awwwww. It likes you, Oz!
     
  6. spup1122

    spup1122 Guest

    Who doesn't like Oz? I mean, other than trolls.
     
  7. Scribe4264

    Scribe4264 Member

    I did screw his mother a little over 31 years ago, so I guess I have to be nice to the little squirt.
     
  8. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Corrected. You have to work some on your AP style ... and your manners.
     
  9. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Oz, and I thought your mom had better taste.
     
  10. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Is there any way Scribe is the evil twin to Clubber Slang? They're both hooked on "your momma" jokes. Only Clubber's are funny, though.
     
  11. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Naw, I'd do Clubber. No way they're twins. Scribe's just Clubber's less interesting imitator.
     
  12. Scribe4264

    Scribe4264 Member

    Oz's paretage aside, I believe the point of this thread, before the liberals hijacked it in a doomed attempt to avoid having to admit they are wrong yet again, was the ESCs are not the grand cure-all that they are falsely being propped up to be.

    I was asked by Dog to show proof that ESCs are causing tumors when implanted in humans.
    I posted such proof and he has yet to respond, much less admit he's wrong.
    I PM'd Dog a question.
    Again, he has yet to respond.
    I have showed that my objection to ESCs are based on medical grounds, yet several attempts have been made to loop me into the religous crowd.
    I have asked Dog to show us his "vast" research on why ESCs will work.
    Aside from the NY Times (almost as accurate and reliable as Wikipedia) and his claim that he has watched TV shows and read books, I see no proof to support his claims.

    Let me state for the record. If in the future research shows ESCs can be controlled and used to treat and/or cure patients suffering from terrible affliction I will be the first to say "well done."
    But for now, ESCs are too unreliable and DANGEROUS and I do not want my tax dollars thrown away on what appears to be voodoo science. We waste enough government money as it is, and we are an over-taxed people. Let the private sector fund the research for now and when, AND IF, appropriate progress is made, then go ahead and shift tax dollars over. I will not have an objection then.
    Here's an idea. Instead of wasting millions upon millions of dollars on political campaigns, why don't we funnel that money to projects such as ESC research and help ease the tax burden on our country?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page