1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

SI tries cloning

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Simon_Cowbell, Jun 15, 2007.

  1. Kato

    Kato Well-Known Member

    I immediately thought of last year's version when I opened my mail today.
     
  2. Claws for Concern

    Claws for Concern Active Member

    I'm not a Dodgers fan, but for longevity alone, that group of Garvey, Lopes, Russell and Cey deserved the title of Best Infield Ever (mined from the minors).
     
  3. 21

    21 Well-Known Member

    No such cover. You have to settle for this:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  4. shockey

    shockey Active Member

    surely you jest. those guys were defensive clowns. :eek: ??? :eek:
     
  5. TyWebb

    TyWebb Well-Known Member

    Where are their hats?
     
  6. novelist_wannabe

    novelist_wannabe Well-Known Member

    I pulled it out of the mailbox, saw the cover and, like others, immediately thought of the one last year. Saw the story was about Omar Minaya, and I was certain it was more of the same, to the point that I was mildly pissed. I mean, the Brewers ... the F-ING MILWAUKEE BREWERS ... are in first place in mid-June, and we get another Omar Minaya story. And yet, I read it anyway, and it was very well done. Gary Smith could probably rewrite Shakespeare and make it better, but damn, how many Mets stories does a national audience have to be subjected to?
     
  7. Mets are pondscum.
     
  8. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    One word would have made that cover inarguable: Defensive.

    Those guys did some amazing things in the field.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  9. tonysoprano

    tonysoprano Member

    Personally, I enjoyed Smith's piece. In terms of where it ranks, to me it's genius (what happens when you've got God-given talent like that), but it seemed like batting practice to him. Still top-notch, but not an out of the park bomb like the h.s. basketball coach who coached in Amish country, or his old Ali stories, or the one on Jimmy Valvano (my very favorites).
     
  10. clutchcargo

    clutchcargo Active Member

    Best Infield Ever? Now that I think about it, this is typical overblown hype where editing staffs with short memories always think the current star or stars is/are the best over. Frankly, I"m tired of that.

    Best infield ever? How about the Cubs of the late '60s that had Santo, Banks, Beckert and Kessinger? Or the Dodgers anchored by Cey and Garvey? Big Red Machine with Morgan, Concepcion, etc.? That's just off the top of my head and probably skips over at least a half-dozen others that were better.

    Quick aside relevant to the gist of my point: It's just like those who call Barry Bonds the greatest player ever? Never won a Triple Crown. Never hit 50 HRs without the juice. Never led a team to World Series title. Not half the fielder his dad was. Longest hitting streak? Six MVPs is meaningful, but it doesn't make him the greatest player ever.
     
  11. PopeDirkBenedict

    PopeDirkBenedict Active Member

    Hey, lets not forget the Cooper-Gantner-Yount-Molitor infield here.

    I thought it was a decent story by Smith's standards, but it definitely wasn't at the "Oh. My. God." level we've all come to expect from Smith.
     
  12. Boobie Miles

    Boobie Miles Active Member

    Same here. Although in fairness I didn't read either story. If I wasn't interested the first go-round, the second wasn't going to be any better.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page